Converting mass entirely into energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter g.lemaitre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Mass
g.lemaitre
Messages
267
Reaction score
2
In The First Three Minutes Weinberg wrote:
When I speak of a given energy
as being equivalent to a given mass, I mean of course that this is the energy that would be released according to the Einstein formula E=mc^2, if the mass were converted entirely to energy.
When he is says mass converted entirely into energy does he mean the massive particles get converted into new particles? or does mass literally disappear and get converted into some magical etherial, ineffable substance, known as pure energy. I'm still confused as to what pure energy is. I think of it as something tantamount to nothing but it can be made in massive particles which move and can perform work and all that with some bit of magic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually they are referring to a matter antimatter annihilation reaction, where a particle and it's anti particle combine to form a couple of photons. It is kind of a sloppy way of talking which is usually reserved for pop-science type books.

The equation E=mc^2 isn't about conversions of mass to energy and vice versa. It simply states that all energy has a little mass and all mass has a lot of energy. Even in an annihilation reaction, the resulting system of photons has all of the original mass (the mass of the system is greater than the sum of the masses of the constituents) and all of the original energy (and all of the original momentum, although that is being set to 0 for this equation).
 
Last edited:
so when he says all of the mass being converted to energy that would be a complete conversion of protons neutrons into photons, neutrinos, electrons and positrons?
 
g.lemaitre said:
so when he says all of the mass being converted to energy that would be a complete conversion of protons neutrons into photons, neutrinos, electrons and positrons?
Certainly not: electrons have rest mass.
He must have meant if all of the contained energy is transformed into radiation energy (photons).
Thus the transformation of matter into radiation, as Dalespam rather well elaborated.

Note also the precise formulation by Einstein in his first paper on that topic:

"If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c²."
-http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
 
Last edited:
g.lemaitre said:
some magical etherial, ineffable substance, known as pure energy. I'm still confused as to what pure energy is.

It doesn't exist. Energy is always a property of something. In the case of electron/positron annihilation, for example, the electron and positron start out with energy due to their motion (kinetic energy) and energy due to their masses (rest-energy). All of that energy gets converted into the energies of the outgoing photons.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top