Converting polar and rectangular coordinates

Entropee
Gold Member
Messages
134
Reaction score
0
So I know x=(r)cos(theta)
and y=(r)sin(theta)

As well as r^2 = x^2 + y^2
And (theta)=tan^-1 y/x or sin^-1 y/r or cos^-1 x/r

If I want to convert the polar coordinates (7.6 , 285(degrees)) to rectangular coordinates, to the nearest hundredth, what would I do?

And also if I were converting the rectangular coordinates (2.4 , 1.8) to polar.


So which variable is which in the coords? so i can plug these in and figure them out...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Put the particular values into their appropriate places in the given equations, and solve for/compute the desired quantities.
 
Is it (r , theta)
or the other way around
 
Conventionally, r is the first coordinate.
 
If you're going from polar to rectangular for complex numbers, the x coordinate usually denotes the real part while the y coordinate denotes the imaginary part. Apart from that it's the same thing.
 
Thanks guys I think i got it :P
This is the best website ever, can't wait to start college next year :P
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top