Convolution with a gaussian G(t)

Gonzolo
Hi. Suppose I have a function T(x,t), units are in Kelvins. I then do a convolution with a gaussian G(t), and the result is also in Kelvins. What are the units of the gaussian G(t)? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gonzolo said:
Hi. Suppose I have a function T(x,t), units are in Kelvins. I then do a convolution with a gaussian G(t), and the result is also in Kelvins. What are the units of the gaussian G(t)? Thanks.

T(x,t)\ast G(t)=:\int_{0}^{t} T(x,\tau)G(t-\tau) d\tau
,and if u want the convolution to have the same units as the T,this means that the 'G' must be dimensionless (a genuine exponential (Gauss-bell) is dimensionless).

Daniel.
 
Thanks, that helps a lot.

Now, the Gaussian that I have has a defined width (duration). But what about its height (amplitude, maximum etc.)?

I would expect the result to have a defined maximum T in Kelvins, that I can use for further physical calculations. How can such a known maximum exist? How must I define my gaussian amplitude? I suspect normalization is involved but I'm not sure how to do it so I have a meaningful maximum T in the end.
 
Actually, doesn't the dtau have units (say s)? So that if G has no units, the integral would have K.s as units?
 
Gonzolo said:
Actually, doesn't the dtau have units (say s)? So that if G has no units, the integral would have K.s as units?

That \tau [/tex] is viewed as a variable of integration and,for obvious reasons,it has the same dimension as &quot;t&quot;.<br /> This function<br /> G(\tau)=\exp(-A\tau^{2}) <br /> is an example of dimensionless function defined everywhere.For obvious reasons,the constant &#039;A&#039; is dimensional and it has the dimensions of <br /> &amp;lt;A&amp;gt;_{SI} =(&amp;lt;\tau&amp;gt;_{SI})^{-2}<br /> <br /> Yes,the integral will have dimensions of K.s,and that&#039;s because the parameter is dimensional.If it wasn&#039;t,it would have been K.<br /> <br /> Daniel.
 
Thanks for the help. I figured out what units my gaussian was in, everything came into place. Reading back the thread, everything now seems so trivial. How typicial.
 
Back
Top