Cool Gas with Ionisation - Can High Voltage Do It?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PH7SICS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cool Gas
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of high voltage on gas molecules, specifically whether ionization can lead to a cooling effect in the gas. Participants explore the implications of removing electrons from atoms and the potential applications of this principle in cooling systems, particularly in a jet of gas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that removing electrons from gas molecules through high voltage could lower the gas's temperature by bringing the atoms to a lower energy state.
  • Another participant references laser cooling as a related concept, though it is unclear how it directly applies to the original question.
  • A proposal is made for a cooling application involving pressurized gas flowing through a nozzle with high voltage, questioning whether this would reduce the gas temperature.
  • Some participants note that creating plasma typically results in increased temperature, which raises questions about the cooling effect of ionization.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between mass and energy, with one participant arguing that removing electrons (considered matter) should lower the energy level of the atom.
  • Another participant challenges this reasoning, questioning whether lighter objects are inherently colder than heavier ones and the implications of mass reduction on temperature.
  • Concerns are raised about the kinetic energy of the nucleus when an electron is removed, suggesting that this could lead to an increase in temperature rather than a decrease.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether ionization leads to cooling or heating effects, with no consensus reached on the implications of removing electrons from gas molecules. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the relationship between ionization and temperature changes.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the mechanisms involved in ionization and its effects on temperature, highlighting the complexity of the interactions between electrons and atomic nuclei. There are also unresolved questions regarding the definitions of energy states and the conditions under which cooling might occur.

PH7SICS
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
If you use high voltage to rip electrons away from gas molecules thus forming ions will this have a cooling effect on the gas? Removing electrons from an atom must bring it to a lower energy state, will that lower energy state manifest itself as a lowering in temperature?

Could you use this principle to cool an object?
 
Science news on Phys.org
they have laser cooling i don't know if that quite what you are asking.
 
I was thinking of its application to cool a jet of gas. Here is a quick sketch. Pressurised gas flows through a nozzle which has sharp points attached to a EHT. The electrons are ripped from the gas thus ionising it as it passes over the grid. Will the temperature of the gas be reduced?
 

Attachments

  • jetcooler.JPG
    jetcooler.JPG
    7.4 KB · Views: 553
usually when a plasma is created it gets hotter.
 
cragar said:
usually when a plasma is created it gets hotter.


A plasma would be created if you used a massive amount of electrical energy, considering the fact that we are dealing with gas at pressure. I however was just thinking about the production of ionised gas as opposed to a plasma state.
 
perhaps you theory is to deep for me to comprehend and we need more expert opinions
 
PH7SICS said:
If you use high voltage to rip electrons away from gas molecules thus forming ions will this have a cooling effect on the gas? Removing electrons from an atom must bring it to a lower energy state, will that lower energy state manifest itself as a lowering in temperature?

Could you use this principle to cool an object?

Why do you think ionizing an atom will lower its internal energy?
 
Andy Resnick said:
Why do you think ionizing an atom will lower its internal energy?

E= MC2 matter is energy and you are removing matter (electrons) from the atom you must be reducing its energy level as you are reducing its mass?
 
PH7SICS said:
E= MC2 matter is energy and you are removing matter (electrons) from the atom you must be reducing its energy level as you are reducing its mass?

Are you implying that lighter objects are colder than heavier objects? Or that cutting an apple in half somehow cools the apple?
 
  • #10
Andy Resnick said:
Are you implying that lighter objects are colder than heavier objects? Or that cutting an apple in half somehow cools the apple?


No, I was answering your question, you asked why I thought ionizing an atom would reduce its energy. If you are removing matter from an atom are you not reducing its energy according to E=MC2 ??

As for my thoughts to why this may cool a gas I have noticed that atoms/molecules tend to eject matter to lower their energy level. That matter could be in the from of photons or electrons but after this mater has been ejected the atom jumps down to a lower energy state. If that is so why wouldn't ripping electrons from an atom cause its energy state to be reduced (this applys to positive ions only)

I am not saying positive ions are stable. If they are at a lover energy level then the environment they will obviously attract electrons to get to the same energy level as the environment and thus archive equilibrium.
 
  • #11
How are you planning to "rip" an electron away from a nucleus without giving the nucleus a BOOST in kinetic energy (and thus temperature)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
15K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
12K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K