Coord. Compound Homework: Mercury (II), Sulfate, Potassium, Ba(NO3)2

  • Thread starter Thread starter XTEND
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the formula of a coordination compound containing mercury (II), sulfate, and potassium ions, with a coordination number of 4 and an electrical conductivity of 7 ions per formula unit. Participants express confusion regarding the role of the sulfate ion, debating whether it acts as a ligand or if it should be a sulfite ion instead. The lack of precipitate formation when adding Ba(NO3)2 suggests that free sulfate ions are not present. There is also a discussion about the naming conventions for sulfite ligands and the stability of mercury complexes. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of coordination chemistry and the nuances of ligand behavior.
XTEND
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A coord. compound of mercury (II) is found to contain the sulfate ion and the potassium ion as well as Hg+2. Ba(NO3)2 solution is added to a water solution of this compound, but there is no precipitate. If the coord. # is 4, and a H20 solution of the compound shows an electrical conductivity equal to 7 ions per formula unit, what is the formula?


Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



[Hg(SO4)4]K2

not sure ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sulfate ion isn't a ligand.
 
Are you sure its a sulfate and not a sulfite ion? Cos' like kldickson mentioned, the sulfate ion isn't a ligand, yet there are no free sulfate ions since no ppt is formed with barium nitrate. Also, the species that you mentioned there is not a compound - it has a net negative charge.
 
ya it must be SO3

But what about the name of the compound? I must be way off?
 
Then its probably K6 [Ag(SO3)4], though i have doubts about the feasibility of its formation. Not sure about the nomenclature of sulfite ligands and the "anionic complex-ed" mercury
 
Set up a reaction between the barium nitrate and the mercury-potassium-sulfate solution.

Also, if I am correct, anions typically aren't ligands.
 
kldickson said:
Also, if I am correct, anions typically aren't ligands.
Not true, anions are in fact rather common ligands since they are stronger ligands than water. For instance, some common ligands are Cl- and CN-.
 
Fightfish, you're right about the anions.
 
kldickson said:
The sulfate ion isn't a ligand.

Not particullarly efficient at complexing, nonetheless some of its complexes have overall stability constants in the 104 range.

Mercury SO32- complexes are much much more stable.

--
 
Back
Top