Copper Plating Mystery: Solve the Puzzle!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flyingwing12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Copper Mystery
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the unexpected results of copper plating using a copper sulfate solution in vinegar, where wire brushing certain metals leads to a strong, semi-gloss copper bond that is difficult to remove. In contrast, conventional electroplating yields poor adhesion, particularly when using "dirty" copper as the anode. The wire brushing likely enhances surface preparation by removing oxides and increasing surface area, which may improve bonding. Additionally, the type of metal being plated could influence the copper's affinity for adhesion. Further experimentation is suggested to explore these intriguing findings and their implications for plating techniques.
Flyingwing12
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I had a solution of copper sulfate in (vinegar) and noticed that when I wire brushed certain metals, the copper made a beautiful arrangement on the work piece, often a perfect semi-gloss. The copper is also seemingly bonded to the metal ( can't wipe it off).

However, when I use conventional electroplating with the solution, the copper just barely hangs on the surface of the work. And with " dirty " copper as the anode, the result is very poor.

So why does this happen? I thought it was the wire wheel depositing a huge positive charge on the work ( which is a pair of pliers with insulated handles. ;) ).

Very interesting indeed.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN2774.jpg
    DSCN2774.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 479
Engineering news on Phys.org
Wire brushing also dramatically changes the surface characteristics doesn't it?
Though, to me, your photo just looks rusty.
 
Interesting. :smile: This might be better placed in the Chemistry subforum, being quite appropriate for industrial chemists.
 
I don't have a whole lot of experience with electroplating, but as Simon alludes to, electroplating is highly sensitive to surface preparation. When you wire brush, you're probably removing surface oxide along with any protective coating. Applying a degreaser (and scrubbing) also goes a long way towards removing oils, grease, and grime (which also 'mask' the surface, preventing deposition).

Still, if you hit the "Report" button, you can summon a moderator and get them to move your post over to Chemistry.
 


After reading your description of the copper plating mystery, it seems that the wire brushing process is creating a stronger bond between the copper and the metal surface compared to conventional electroplating. This could be due to the mechanical action of the wire brush, which may clean and roughen the surface, providing more surface area for the copper to adhere to. It is also possible that the wire brush is creating a more positive charge on the metal, allowing for better bonding with the copper ions in the solution.

Another factor to consider is the composition of the metal being plated. Some metals may have a natural affinity for copper, making it easier for the copper to bond and form a strong arrangement. Additionally, the use of "dirty" copper as the anode may also affect the plating process as it can introduce impurities into the solution.

Further experimentation and analysis would be needed to fully understand the mechanisms at play in this copper plating mystery. It is always exciting to discover new and unexpected results in scientific experiments, and your findings may open up new possibilities for improved plating techniques in the future.
 
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...

Similar threads

Back
Top