Correcting Solutions for Euler's Equation with Kronecker Delta Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Precursor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler's equation
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Precursor
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
How do I solve the following Euler's equation:

[tex]r^2 B_n'' + r B_n' - n^2 B_n = 3 \delta_{n1} r^2[/tex]

Such that the solution is:

[tex]B_n(r) = \beta_n r^n + \delta_{n1}r^2, \forall n \ge 1[/tex]

where βn is a free coefficient, δ is the Kronecker delta function, and the solutions unbounded at r=0 are discarded.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Precursor said:
How do I solve the following Euler's equation:

[tex]r^2 B_n'' + r B_n' - n^2 B_n = 3 \delta_{n1} r^2[/tex]

Such that the solution is:

[tex]B_n(r) = \beta_n r^n + \delta_{n1}r^2, \forall n \ge 1[/tex]

where [itex]\beta_{n}[/itex] is a free coefficient, [itex]\delta[/itex] is the Kronecker delta function, and the solutions unbounded at [itex]r = 0[/itex] are discarded.

You try to solve the differential equation for different values of n. n=1 is obviously different from all other n. The trick for an equation in this form is to use a trial function of the form ##B_n(r)=Cr^k## and solve for k.
 
Last edited:
Is the [itex]\delta_{n1}r^2[/itex] obtained in the solution by linearity? And why is the coefficient '3' not in front?
 
Precursor said:
Is the [itex]\delta_{n1}r^2[/itex] obtained in the solution by linearity? And why is the coefficient '3' not in front?

I'm not sure what you are asking. The case n=1 is different from the other values of n because then the right side is 3r^2. If n is not 1 then the right side is 0. That's what the Kronecker delta does. They are two different cases. Solve them separately.
 
Last edited:
I've followed your steps, but when I'm solving the case for n = 1, I get [itex]B_{1} = \beta_{1}r + r^{2}[/itex]. Shouldn't it only be [itex]r^{2}[/itex]?
 
Precursor said:
I've followed your steps, but when I'm solving the case for n = 1, I get [itex]B_{1} = \beta_{1}r + r^{2}[/itex]. Shouldn't it only be [itex]r^{2}[/itex]?

Yes, it should. You have to put ##\beta_{1}=0## in that case. The problem statement is sloppy.