Cosmic rays and induced radioactivity

AI Thread Summary
Cosmic rays primarily consist of protons, which contribute to the net positive charge on Earth's surface without making it positively charged overall. The discussion clarifies that while exposure to radiation can induce radioactivity in materials, this typically occurs only if the material is activated by neutron or proton flux, or by high-energy electron or gamma radiation. It is generally false to claim that all bodies exposed to radiation become radioactive unless they are contaminated with radioactive substances. The conversation emphasizes the specific conditions under which materials can become radioactive. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately assessing the effects of cosmic rays and radiation exposure.
rob60
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


90% of the cosmic rays that fall on Earth are protons. So the outside of the Earth is hit by a net positive charge but does not seem to be, in particular, positively charged. How do you explain this?
One last thing: I read that a body that is exposed to radiation becomes radioactive radiation source in turn ... I think it is generally false unless the body is contaminated with radioactive material. It is correct?
thank you


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
rob60 said:
One last thing: I read that a body that is exposed to radiation becomes radioactive radiation source in turn ... I think it is generally false unless the body is contaminated with radioactive material. It is correct?


In general, you are correct. Material exposed to a neutron or proton flux can become activated, which usually makes some part of it radioactive, and energetic enough electron or gamma fluxes can also do it (but it in general takes a lot of energy).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top