What is the outer source of anomalous cosmic rays?

AI Thread Summary
Researchers have identified that a significant portion of anomalous cosmic rays (ACRs) originates from interactions with dust grains in the Kuiper Belt, rather than solely from neutral atoms in the local interstellar cloud. This discovery reveals that sputtered atoms from collisions in the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt are ionized and picked up by the solar wind, contributing to the composition of ACRs. The findings challenge the traditional understanding of ACR sources, which did not account for the presence of easily ionized elements like carbon, silicon, and iron. This new perspective enhances knowledge about the mass distribution and composition of the Kuiper Belt and offers insights into plasma-dust interactions in stellar environments. Overall, the research provides a valuable tool for further exploration of cosmic ray origins.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/10/021031071017.htm

ScienceDaily (Oct. 31, 2002) — WASHINGTON - Researchers have found that a portion of anomalous cosmic rays -- charged particles accelerated to enormous energies by the solar wind -- results from interactions with dust grains from a belt of comet-sized objects near Pluto's orbit. These objects make up what is known as the Kuiper Belt, a remnant of the formation of the solar system.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Here's the actual Geophysical Research Letters paper...

The Outer Source of Pickup Ions and Anomalous Cosmic Rays
Abstract. The traditionally accepted source of Anomalous Cosmic
Rays (ACRs) is neutral atoms penetrating the heliosphere from
the local interstellar cloud (LIC). The ACR composition should be
depleted in easily ionized atoms such as C, Si, and Fe. However, significant
fluxes of these ions are observed in ACRs and their source
has not been previously identified. We show that there is an “outer
source” of pickup ions, and hence ACRs, caused by sputtered atoms
(subsequently ionized and picked up by the solar wind) from small
grains generated via collisions of objects in the Edgeworth-Kuiper
Belt. The outer source accounts for the abundance and composition
of the additional population of ACRs. The discovery that
ACRs are generated from material in the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt
provides an exciting new tool for understanding the mass distribution
and composition of the Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt, and for probing
the plasma-dust interactions in stellar environments.

N. A. Schwadron
Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas
M. Combi
Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Science, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
W. Huebner, D. J. McComas
Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas
http://people.bu.edu/nathanas/pub/OuterSource.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top