I Cosmological constant and structure formation

AI Thread Summary
The presence of the cosmological constant significantly impacts the formation of structures in the universe, making it more difficult for large gravitationally-bound structures to develop. It leads to the decay of gravitational potentials over time, which is evidenced by the Sachs-Wolfe effect. The Integrated Sachs-Wolfe Effect serves as a key experimental method to test the cosmological constant, revealing correlations between cosmic microwave background (CMB) hot/cold spots and local structures. Observations confirm that photons gain energy when traversing gravitational wells due to this decay, resulting in a net blueshift. The existence of these predicted correlations supports the influence of the cosmological constant on cosmic structure formation.
Ranku
Messages
433
Reaction score
18
TL;DR Summary
Hoe much is structure formation in the universe affected by the presence of cosmological constant?
How much impact does the presence of the cosmological constant have on the formation of structures in the universe? On a larger scale, is there less structure formation because of the presence of the cosmological constant?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Yes. The cosmological constant makes it harder for large gravitationally-bound structures to form. It also causes gravitational potentials for larger systems to decay over time (resulting in the Sachs-Wolfe effect).
 
  • Like
Likes Ranku
kimbyd said:
Yes. The cosmological constant makes it harder for large gravitationally-bound structures to form. It also causes gravitational potentials for larger systems to decay over time (resulting in the Sachs-Wolfe effect).

What experiments (if any) can test the presence of the cosmological constant?
 
lucas_ said:
What experiments (if any) can test the presence of the cosmological constant?
The effect is most clearly visible using the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe Effect. With no cosmological constant, there should be no correlation between the hot/cold spots on the CMB and local structure. The ISW Effect, however, creates such a correlation because of the aforementioned decay of gravitational potentials. A photon enters a gravitational well. Then, over the time it takes the photon to traverse the well, the well has decayed a bit, meaning the photon gains more energy entering the well than it loses escaping it. The result is a net blueshift. The reverse happens when the photon travels through a large void.

The ISW effect has been observed to a reasonably-high degree of accuracy, as the predicted correlation does indeed exist.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top