Cosmology Question that I really don't have a clue on.

  • Thread starter Thread starter ppyadof
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology
ppyadof
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a) Using the Robertson-Walker metric, write down an expression for the proper distance in terms of the coordinate r. For objects moving with the expansion of the universe, show that the proper distance increases with time in the manner described by the Hubble Law.

b) Use the Friedmann equations for a matter-dominated universe Universe with \Lambda = 0 to show that:
H(z) = H_0 (1+z)(1 + \Omega_0 z)^{1/2}[/itex]<br /> <br /> c) Define the angular diameter distance d_A of an object and relate this to the coordinate r appearing in the Robertson-Walker metric. Show that in a matter dominated universe with \Omega_0 = 1,<br /> d_A = \frac{2c}{H}\lbrace(1+z)^{-1} - (1+z)^{-3/2}\rbrace<br /> <br /> <br /> <h2>Homework Equations</h2><br /> ds^2 = c^2 dt^2 - a^2(t)\lbrace \frac{dr^2}{1-kr^2} \rbrace + r^2(d\theta^2 + sin^2\theta d\phi)<br /> <br /> \lbrace\frac{da}{dt}\rbrace^2 + kc^2 = \frac{8 \pi G \rho^2}{3} + \frac{\Lambda c^2 a^2}{3}<br /> <br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2><br /> a) If ds=0, then let l_p = cdt = adr and so by considering<br /> \frac{dr}{dt} = Hr<br /> and<br /> H = \frac{ \dot{a}}{a}<br /> it means that:<br /> \dot{l_p} = \dot{a}r<br /> <br /> I don&#039;t even have the slightest idea where to start for parts b and c. Any help on those would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


b) To show that the proper distance increases with time in the manner described by the Hubble Law, we can use the Friedmann equations for a matter-dominated universe with \Lambda = 0:

H^2 = \frac{8 \pi G \rho}{3} <br /> <br /> and<br /> <br /> \frac{\ddot{a}}{a} = - \frac{4 \pi G \rho}{3} &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; From the first Friedmann equation, we can substitute in the definition of Hubble&amp;#039;s constant (H_0 = H(t=0)) and the critical density (\rho_c = \frac{3H_0^2}{8 \pi G}) to get:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; H^2 = \frac{8 \pi G \rho}{3} = H_0^2 \frac{\rho}{\rho_c} &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Then, using the second Friedmann equation and substituting in the definition of the critical density, we get:&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; \frac{\ddot{a}}{a} = - \frac{4 \pi G \rho}{3} = - \frac{4 \pi G}{3} H_0^2 \frac{\rho}{\rho_c} = - \frac{4 \pi G}{3} H_0^2 \frac{1}{a^3} &amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; We can then solve for \rho and substitute it into the first Friedmann equation to get:&amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; H^2 = \frac{8 \pi G \rho}{3} = \frac{8 \pi G}{3} H_0^2 \frac{1}{a^3} = H_0^2 \left(\frac{\ddot{a}}{a}\right)^2 &amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;gt; This can be simplified to:&amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;gt; \frac{\dot{a}}{a} = H_0 \left(\frac{\ddot{a}}{a}\right)^{1/2} &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; Using the definition of Hubble&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#039;s constant and the second Friedmann equation, we can substitute in for \frac{\ddot{a}}{a} to get:&amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; \frac{\dot{a}}{a} = H_0 \left(- \frac{4 \pi G}{3} H_0^2 \frac{1}{a^3}\right)^{1/2} =
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top