Cosmology Questions: Answers to Help You Pass Exam

  • Thread starter Thread starter Olivia Grace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the age of the universe involves using Hubble's constant, which is expressed in km/s/Mpc, and can be estimated as 1/H, though this is a crude approximation that depends on the cosmological model used. The Einstein-de Sitter model suggests an age of 2/3H^-1, while a matter-dominated universe gives an estimate of 3/(2H). The critical density of the universe is also model-dependent, and while Hubble's constant and critical density are interrelated, the actual density of the universe remains uncertain. Current estimates place Hubble's constant around 70 km/s/Mpc, with a margin of error of about 10%. Understanding these concepts is crucial for passing the exam on cosmology topics.
Olivia Grace
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm new to this forum, but saw that everyone was so kind and helpful, so was wondering if anyone could help me with a couple of things..

How does one calculate the age of the universe using Hubble's constant, if the constant is in km/s/Mpc?

Do we know the critical density of the universe? I always thought that experts had a few pretty good estimates, but then someone told me today that this wasn't true..

Does anyone know a thought experiment for length contraction that does not involve a train and a tunnel? For some reaosn this thought experiment always confuses me...I knew one once with a rocket traveling to alpha centauri at 0.8c, but am not sure if this is allowed if it assumes time dilation..

If anyone could help I would be so grateful! I have an exam on all of this tomorrow!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the age of the universe, I've tried multiplying the constant by 1x10^3, then changing the Mpc into light years..is this correct?
 
If H is the Hubble constant, then the age of the universe can be determined as the inverse of the constant, that is 1/H.
EDIT: But this is ofcourse a very crude estimation.
 
The age depends on what model you are using. For example, the age using the Einstein-de Sitter model is given by

\frac{2}{3}H^{-1}.

The critical density is also dependent on the choice of model so no one "knows" this density.
 
The Hubble constant has the units of 1/sec. An estimate of the age of the universe is given by 1/H. The exact age depends on your exact model of the universes evolution. E.g. assuming it is matter dominated (should be a good approximation) we get 3/(2*H). We know the critical density exactly as well as we know H. They define each other. What we don't know is the real density. A difference between these two would indicate the universe is spatially curved to a significant degree. Current consensus is that it is not.
 
The Hubble constant has the units of 1/sec. An estimate of the age of the universe is given by 1/H. The exact age depends on your exact model of the universes evolution. E.g. assuming it is matter dominated (should be a good approximation) we get 3/(2*H). We know the critical density exactly as well as we know H. They define each other. What we don't know is the real density. A difference between these two would indicate the universe is spatially curved to a significant degree. Current consensus is that it is not.
 
Thanks for your help so far! My problem is determining the age of the universe from the units I have been given, km/s/Mpc...how does one change these units ino units suitable for the 1/H method?
 
1 Mpc=3*10^19 km. Put this in and cancel the km.
 
Hey thanks!
 
  • #10
Dick said:
We know the critical density exactly as well as we know H. They define each other.

We do not know H exactly, but it is estimated to be around 70 km/s/Mpc with an error of ~10%.
 
  • #11
My point was that the uncertainty in H is "exactly the same" as the uncertainty in the critical density. Not that either was measured exactly. Thanks for the clarification.
 
Back
Top