MHB Cost Functions for a Firm: Marginal & Average Cost

AI Thread Summary
The cost function for a firm is defined as C(x) = 300x - 10x^2 - 1/3x^3. The marginal cost function can be derived by taking the first derivative of the cost function, resulting in MC(x) = 300 - 20x - x^2. The average cost function is obtained by dividing the total cost by the output, yielding AC(x) = (300x - 10x^2 - 1/3x^3) / x. To find the output level where marginal cost equals average cost, set MC(x) equal to AC(x) and solve for x. This analysis is crucial for understanding cost management in production.
marutkpadhy
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
The cost function of a firm is given by C(x) = 300x - 10x^2 - 1/3x^3.

A) Find the Marginal Cost Function

B) Average cost function

C) The output at which marginal cost is equal to average cost.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can you show us what you have tried so we know how best to help?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top