Could someone solve for s/p (or p/s) in terms of v?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sikz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the equation To - (To(s/p)) = To / sqrt{1 - v^2 / 299792458^2} for the variables s/p or p/s in terms of v. The original poster acknowledges that their initial equation was incorrect and plans to revise it. There is a request for assistance in solving the equation, indicating a need for clarification on the symbols used. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in manipulating the equation correctly. The poster expresses intent to return for further help after reworking their approach.
Sikz
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
To-(To(s/p))=To/sqrt{1 - v^2 / 299792458^2}<br /> <br /> If my symbols stuff isn&#039;t right:<br /> To-(To(s/p))=To/[1 - v^2 / 299792458^2]^0.5<br /> <br /> Can anyone solve for s/p or p/s in terms of v?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Not that anyone helped me... But I did it and found my original equation is wrong... So I'll redo it and then bother you guys some more :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top