Could Tesla's Wardenclyffe Tower Have Revolutionized Wireless Energy Transfer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phinks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tower
AI Thread Summary
Tesla's Wardenclyffe Tower aimed to revolutionize wireless energy transfer, but significant challenges remain regarding efficiency and energy loss. Critics argue that while Tesla's designs suggested high efficiency, the fundamental physics of energy transmission indicate that radiating energy omnidirectionally leads to substantial loss. The concept of "flux linkage" proposed by Tesla is debated, as it requires specific conditions to effectively capture emitted energy. Additionally, existing radio technology demonstrates that most transmitted energy is lost, with only a fraction reaching receivers. Ultimately, while Tesla's vision was ambitious, practical limitations in physics and technology hindered its realization.
Phinks
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Is There Any Reason Why Tesla's Wardenclyffe Tower Wouldn't Work?


All the sources I've seen on his work and inventions give the impression of him being a great inventor but his greatest works being denied because of politics and economics. Are there any Physics based reasons why his faciliate at Wardenclyffe Tower would not radiate energy, with minimal loss, over huge distances?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the "minimal loss" part that's the problem. You can't radiate energy in all directions then expect to receive it with minimal loss.

Besides, we already have radio. This is basically just a large radio antenna.
 
Effieciency

His designs were reported to be able to reach excellent efficiencies over large distances because of the fact the energy from these EM waves only transferred to something resonating at the same frequency. The energy is 'tunnelled' by flux linkage*. Its like a carrier wave that takes power across when connected to a receiving unit.

The fact it works so well omnidirectionally is why it was such a fantastic idea.

And radio is signal energy, Tesla's ultimate plan was to use Wardenclyffe Tower to transmit power; the kind of requirements that could meet industries and homes alike. His intended to have many of these towers dotted around America so that it could be powered wireless. Instead of the current, barbaric grid system.


*that isn't actually true. Its not flux linkage, but it is a method which has a similar effect.
 
Last edited:
and how did he actually build a device to create this "flux linkage"? (or whatever your trying to call it)

if you look at the physics behind power transmisssion, you need a loop of wire to contain a changing flux and thus suck power off of the wave. However the sorce has already emitted the energy, and if something doesn't stand in the way of the ray then the power just gets wasted as it drifts out into space.
 
Pinks, if you read Tesla's own words on the subject, you'll see it's just a big radio tower.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wardenclyffe_Tower

Radio towers do transmit power wirelessly - that's how a radio works. Yes, he was right about a lot of his ideas for improving transmission, but still, a radio station loses virtually all of its energy in the transmission. What is actually received by the listeners is miliwatts apiece (if that), while the transmitter is putting out kilowatts.

And if you read the description about devices that can receives power from this, you'll see that they are just crystal radios: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio
 
Last edited:
I'm thinking the most efficient "flux linkage" would be a copper cable. :smile:
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top