Could Tunnel Construction on the Moon Solve Earth's Practical Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter UrbanXrisis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for constructing tunnels on the Moon and their implications for solving practical problems on Earth. The period of oscillation for a tunnel is derived using gravitational equations, with participants exploring how to adapt these equations for lunar conditions. Key challenges include the lack of atmosphere on the Moon, which eliminates air friction, and the effects of the Moon's rotation on objects dropped into the tunnel. While some issues can be mitigated through technology like frictionless magnetic confinement, material durability for tunnel walls remains a significant concern. Overall, the feasibility of lunar tunnels presents intriguing possibilities for addressing terrestrial challenges.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
I was given the equation for the period of oscillation thought a tunnel:T=2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{R_E^3}{GM_E}}

then asked how I could transform that into T=2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{R_E}{g}}

which I did through the idea that g=\frac{GM_E}{R_E^2}

The the question asked what would be the period if tunnels were made though the moon?

and what practical problem regarding these tunnels on Earth would be removed if they were built on the Moon?

I'm clueless here
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm guessing that the equation would be the same equation but just use the radius of the moon and the acceleration of the moon?

The practical problem would be there is no air friction?
 
They gave you the equation for the determining the period of oscillation - all you have to do is find out the radius of the Moon, the gravitational acceleration on the Moon, and plug the numbers into your equation.

Yes, the lack of atmosphere eliminates one practical problem. There's another, though. The Moon, like the Earth, is rotating. What direction will gravity accelerate an object dropped into the tunnel? How long will the tunnel occupy the space that gravity's pulling the object toward? In fact, how much lateral velocity did the object have when it was first dropped? (the object should initially be traveling the same direction and speed as the surface was).

That problem won't exactly be eliminated on the Moon. However, if you calculate the angular velocity of the Earth's rotation and the angular velocity of the Moon's rotation, you'll notice the problem isn't nearly as big on the Moon (in fact, it's about 27.4 times smaller).

Here's a discussion we had about the type of tunnels you're talking about.

tunnel through the centre
 
UrbanXrisis said:
I was given the equation for the period of oscillation thought a tunnel:T=2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{R_E^3}{GM_E}}

then asked how I could transform that into T=2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{R_E}{g}}

which I did through the idea that g=\frac{GM_E}{R_E^2}

The the question asked what would be the period if tunnels were made though the moon?

and what practical problem regarding these tunnels on Earth would be removed if they were built on the Moon?

I'm clueless here

There are no doubt several things one could identify, but most of those could be overcome. Air resistance could be eliminated by evacuating the tunnel. Rotational problems could be eliminated by frictionless magnetic confinement to keep the object in the tunnel. The major practical problem I see is finding a material for the walls of a tunnel that can withstand the environment. What is the composition of the core of the Earth and that of the moon?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top