Multiple peer reviewed studies have been emerging in recent years
concerning wireless pollution's extremely low frequency (ELF)
magnetic fields inducing stess response genes of Oxidative DNA damage to cells
and neurotoxic effects
Parkinson's type symptoms do come under the umbrella of neurotoxic
Neurotoxic
(medicine) Adverse effects on the structure or function of the central and/or peripheral nervous system caused by exposure to a toxic chemical, symptoms include muscle weakness, loss of sensation and motor control, tremors, cognitive alterations, and autonomic nervous system dysfunction
Univ of Albany dropped a bomb shell recently outlining evidence in that regard
entitled:
BioInitiative Report:
A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard
for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF)
http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/index.htm
Effects are not specifically segregated for ELF or RF, since many overlapping exposures
occur in daily life; and because this is an artificial division based on frequencies as
defined in physics that has little bearing on the biological effects. Both ELF and RF, for
example have been shown to cause cells to generate stress proteins, a universal sign of
distress in plant, animal and human cells.
Like second-hand smoke, EMF is a complex mixture, where different frequencies,
intensities, durations of exposure(s), modulation, waveform and other factors is known to
produce variable effects. Many years of scientific study has produced substantial
evidence that EMF may be considered to be both carcinogenic and neurotoxic.
http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/docs/section_5.pdf
SECTION 5: Evidence for Effects on Gene and Protein Expression (Transcriptomic and Proteomic Research)
Dr. Xu and Dr. Chen
http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/docs/section_6.pdf
SECTION 6: Evidence for Genotoxic Effects – RFR and ELF DNA Damage
Dr. Lai
http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/docs/section_7.pdf
SECTION 7: Evidence for Stress Response (Stress Proteins)
Dr. Blank
http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/docs/section_8.pdf
SECTION 8: Evidence for Effects on Immune Function
Dr. Johansson
http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/docs/section_9.pdf
SECTION 9: Evidence for Effects on Neurology and Behavior
Dr. Lai
http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/docs/section_14.pdf
SECTION 14: Evidence for Disruption by the Modulating Signal
Dr. Blackman
-------------------------
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15999632?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=2&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed
Does "electromagnetic pollution" cause illness? An inquiry among Austrian general practitioners.
Leitgeb N, Schröttner J, Böhm M.
Institute of Clinical Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Norbert.Leitgeb@tugraz.at
More and more self-declared electromagnetic hypersensitive patients are entering physicians' practices seeking help. To assess the prevalence of cases and the opinion of Austrian physicians regarding the potential health-relevance of environmental electromagnetic fields ("electromagnetic pollution"), a statistical investigation among general practitioners was undertaken, with surprising results. Only one-third report on never having been asked about the health impact of electromagnetic pollution by patients. An overwhelming percentage of general practitioners (up to 96%) to some degree, or totally, believe in a health-relevant role of environmental electromagnetic fields, and only 39% have never associated health symptoms with "electromagnetic pollution". Two-thirds are consulted occasionally or even frequently by self-declared electromagnetic hypersensitive patients. However, sound information seems to be lacking. Knowledge on existing electromagnetic exposure limits and on environmental field levels in relation to them is poor. It is remarkable that authorities play a marginal role in informing physicians. Only 4% mention having received information on "electromagnetic pollution" from such a source. It is rather remarkable that there is such a widespread contradiction between physicians' opinions and established national and international health risk assessment. With respect to the frequency with which doctors are confronted with this issue, the results demonstrate an urgent need for action.
--------------
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/l...006546.pdf?arnumber=1006546&authDecision=-203
Electromagnetic pollution, caused by increasing human activity, in the area of utilization of electrical and electromagnetic energy, is slowly increasing without much appreciation of the consequential implications. While everyone is aware of the benefits derived from the high-tech electrical and electronic devices and systems, only few users are aware of the real or unsuspected dangers from them
-------------
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/93517371/abstract
Low frequency (< 300 Hz) electromagnetic (EM) fields induce biological changes that include effects ranging from increased enzyme reaction rates to increased transcript levels for specific genes. The induction of stress gene HSP70 expression by exposure to EM fields provides insight into how EM fields interact with cells and tissues. Insights into the mechanism(s) are also provided by examination of the interaction of EM fields with moving charges and their influence on enzyme reaction rates in cell-free systems. Biological studies with in vitro model systems have focused, in general, on the nature of the signal transduction pathways involved in response to EM fields.
----
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15788236?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=3&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed
long-term exposure to ELF-EMF which may cause oxidative DNA damage
---------
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/66004416/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0#relatedArticles