Countercurrent condensation loop

  • Thread starter Thread starter imsmooth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condensation Loop
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on creating liquid nitrogen from air using a countercurrent condensation loop. The process involves compressing air to 200 atm, expanding it, and using a countercurrent coil to precool the compressed air. The user seeks advice on the optimal length for the countercurrent coil, considering the balance between heat transfer efficiency and diminishing returns. Recommendations include consulting resources like "Transport Phenomena" and the "Chemical Engineer's Handbook" for guidance on designing heat exchangers. Understanding fluid mechanics and heat transfer principles is essential for effective system design.
imsmooth
Messages
154
Reaction score
13
I will be attempting to make liquid nitrogen from air. Part of the process involves passing air compressed to 200 atm through a coil and rapidly expanding it. The expanded air that does not form liquid from the rapid cooling will pass back over the condensor coils in a counter-current fashion to precool the compressed air. Of course, this countercurrent system will be insulated from the surroundings.

My question is this: how long should should I make the countercurrent coil for it to be effective? I know I will transfer more heat with a longer coil, but there has to be a point of diminsishing returns. There are many variables so I think this comes down to experience. Does anyone have any idea?

I am planning on something between 8-16 feet for the coil.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you had any courses in fluid mechanics and heat transfer? You can calculated all this. See Transport Phenomena by Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot. You might also find an engineering handbook such as the Chemical Engineer's Handbook useful. The details of the complete methodology are a little too extensive to explain here. Basically, you need to learn how to design a heat exchanger.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top