Counting cycles in a permutation

samkolb
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to show that for two permutations f ang g in Sn, the number of disjoint cycles in fg is the same as the number of disjoint cycles in gf. I know that in general fg does not equal gf, but by working examples it seems like they always decompose into the same number of disjoint cycles. Is this even true? Can anyone find a counterexample?

I solved the related problem of showing that fg and gf both fix the same number of elements. This is true because fg fixes x if and only if gf fixes g(x), and g is a bijection.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oops -- I posted a full solution here and then realized ... this is a homework problem, isn't it? At least it sure sounds like one.

So here's a piece of a solution. Should get you started!

samkolb said:
I solved the related problem of showing that fg and gf both fix the same number of elements. This is true because fg fixes x if and only if gf fixes g(x), and g is a bijection.

It seems like your 1:1 mapping between fixed points in fg and gf generalizes to a 1:1 mapping between disjoint cycles, too. In particular, note that

<br /> (f \circ g)^n = f \circ g \circ f \circ ... \circ g<br />

while

<br /> (g \circ f)^n = g \circ f \circ g \circ ... \circ f<br />

So, if (fg)n carries x to itself, where does (gf)n carry g(x)?

'Nuff said.
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top