Counting Integer Solutions to Curves of the Form x^n-c-ky=0

Klaus_Hoffmann
Messages
85
Reaction score
1
Let be a open curve on R^2 so x^{n}-c-ky=0 where k,n and c are integers, are there any methods to calculate or at least know if the curve above will have integer roots (a,b) so a^{n}-c-kb=0 ?? or perhaps to calculate the number of solutions as a sum (involving floor function) over integers of expressions like

[(x^{n}-c)k^{-1}]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reduce modulo k.
 
thanks, but however i think that solving x^{n}=c mod(y) is even harder
 
I suggested you reduce modulo k, rather than modulo y.

Actually, what you wrote is trivially easy to find solutions for, but they won't help you solve the original equation.
 
Klaus_Hoffmann said:
Let be a open curve on R^2 so x^{n}-c-ky=0 where k,n and c are integers,

This is neither an open set, nor are all curves of this form.

are there any methods to calculate or at least know if the curve above will have integer roots (a,b) so a^{n}-c-kb=0 ??

yes, trivially there will be plenty, i.e. infinitely many of integer point (I don't think you mean root, by the way), on the curveif c is an n'th root mod k, and none if not.

This is the kind of question that eljose would ask.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top