Counting Problem: Proving the Integer Property of ((n^2)!)!/(n!)^(n+1)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the expression ((n^2)!)!/(n!)^(n+1) is an integer. Participants suggest breaking down the denominator into factors that must be present in the numerator, specifically noting that (n^2)! is greater than n^(n+1). The multinomial theorem is referenced, where setting equal parts leads to the conclusion that (k^2)!/(k!)^k is an integer. This approach indicates that the original expression can be shown to be an integer by leveraging combinatorial principles. Overall, the argument hinges on the relationships between factorials and their divisors.
fourier jr
Messages
764
Reaction score
13
show that \frac{ ((n^2)!)!}{(n!)^{n+1}} is an integer.

i was thinking of saying that there are so many people who can be put on a committee, etc etc which would make an integer. i don't think this is real hard but nothing is really jumping out at me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{ ((n^2)!)!}{(n!)^{n+1}}

Not to bad. The denominator can be broken into:
<br /> (n^{n+1})((n-1)^{n+1})... ... ...<br />

Each one of these term must be in the (n^2)! term in the numerator or be a divisor of this term.

<br /> (n^2)! &gt; n^{n+1}<br />

Therefore \frac{ ((n^2)!)!}{(n!)^{n+1}} must be an integer.
 
update: i thought of something that might be easier. check this out


the multinomial theorem says

\left(\begin{array}{cc}n\\ r_1, r_2, ..., r_k \end{array} \right) = \frac{n!}{r_1!r_2!...r_k!} for r_1 + r_2 + ... + r_k = n

so if i set r_1 = r_2 = ... = r_k = k, then r_1 + r_2 + ... + r_k = k.k = k^2 in which case the multimonial theorem gives me \frac{(k^2)!}{(k!)^k} which is an integer by definiton, so I'm almost there & i just need to do the rest somehow
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top