Coupling Using Theta as a Boundary

Goldstone1
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have a mass M_0 (here denoted with lowercase zero because of previous discussions on relativistic mass), and I have a gravitational field \phi which can under make a shift of 180^o between a negative plane and a positive plane. Assume also that the mass is considered as a charge, rather than something being separate to it, and then:

\Delta E \Psi= \sum_{i}^{\theta} M_{0i} \phi (\Lambda^{-1} x) \psi_i

The question is the coupling. Since the boundary of the sum is the shift of -sin \theta and -cos \theta then \phi is related to the mass by the probability coupling field \Psi. Have I made my coupling correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't heard anything on my post. I wonder if that was because of a lack of information?

Interestingly, as I speak of the M^2\phi^2-term as an oscillation of some field energy [1], I must be saying the square root of this energy is the range in which the field invariant takes on shift values of \pi \in (\mathcal{R},\mathcal{C}). This is a gravitational charge energy - the mass of the quantum in question. Because one can invoke the inverse solution equation ''implying a change in the field'' \Delta \phi(x), you find

\Delta E \Psi = \sum_{i}^{\theta} M_i \phi(\Lambda^{-1}x) \psi_i

the interaction term M_{i}\psi_{i} \psi^{\dagger}_{i} on \phi(\psi_i) insures a self-interactive Hamiltonian \mathcal{H}. What we have is a gravitational energy Hamiltonian that can be converted in the understanding of conventional mass weighing systems, There are many contributions to the system which does not involve the mass alone - for instance the energy of the electric and magnetic vacuum are not taken into consideration, but it will be a project of mine these next few weeks to understand that kind of system. For instance, as I have speculated, physics says that an electron absorption of a fluctuation of the zero-point energies has dimensions \frac{eh}{2Mc}.

\mathcal{H} \Psi = (\sum_{i}^{\theta} M_i \phi(\Lambda^{-1}x) + \frac{eh}{2Mc}) \psi_i

This equation is the total energy of the gravitational field with a contribution of zero-point energy, a photon in this case. So this is a quantum description of the energy of a field, the gravitational field - and the field occupies gradients where the photon in the zero-point field lie on the range \phi=0 as a ground state boundary system. This is just quantum mechanics right? I don't see how you can falsify the condition of the Hamiltonian...

[1] - It plays a form, increased by one scalar field \phi, that the electromagnetic interaction D_{\mu}D^{\mu} \phi which has the value of M^2 \phi -
this is famously known as the mass-squared term M^2.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top