Programs Courses for Theoretical Physics PhD

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the adequacy of a proposed course selection for applying to a PhD program in theoretical physics. The individual has outlined a comprehensive list of courses taken in both physics and mathematics departments, expressing concern about the absence of general relativity and advanced quantum mechanics courses. They are weighing the option of substituting algebra with topology and considering whether to prioritize mathematics over physics courses. Participants in the discussion emphasize that while advanced mathematics courses can be beneficial, they may not directly enhance understanding of physics concepts, as the teaching approaches differ significantly. There is a consensus on the importance of having a solid foundation in general relativity and quantum mechanics, as these subjects are crucial for graduate studies. The individual seeks reassurance that their course selection will not disadvantage them in the eyes of admissions committees, particularly regarding perceived gaps in their physics education. Overall, the conversation highlights the balance between mathematics and physics coursework in preparing for a competitive PhD application.
tarnhelm
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
What do you think of the following courses in my last two years, if I intend to apply for a good PhD in a more Theoretical area of Physics:

In the Physics dept:

Mathematical Methods 1
Waves & Diffraction
Quantum Mechanics
Thermal Physics
Electromagnetic Theory 1
Solid State Physics
Nuclear & Particle Physics
Atomic Systems
Particle Physics
Research Project

In the Maths dept:

Mathematical Methods (ODEs and PDEs)
Analysis of Differentiation and Integration
Methods of Complex Analysis
Abstract Algebra
Mechanics of Rigid and Deformable Bodies
Dynamical Systems
Partial Differential Equations (calculus of variations, Hamiltonian formalism etc)
Mathematical Physics (operators, symmetries, lie groups etc)
Further Complex Analysis

I could substitute the Algebra course for a Topology course, depending on which is more useful, and then do Differential Geometry instead of Further Complex Analysis.

Is this adequate to get into a good PhD program? I'm concerned about the lack of relativity and more advanced quantum mechanics courses. The alternative is to drop most of the Maths and do GR and Quantum Theory, but I want a good foundation in Maths. There's not much scope for flexibility here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tarnhelm said:
I'm concerned about the lack of relativity and more advanced quantum mechanics courses. The alternative is to drop most of the Maths and do GR and Quantum Theory, but I want a good foundation in Maths. There's not much scope for flexibility here.

In my (fellow undergraduate) experience, upper division math courses are not extremely useful for physics (even theoretical). The way the mathematicians would like to teach the course and the way in which the maths might be applicable to a physics concept (i.e. group theory to quantum mechanics) is usually very different. Of course, it can never hurt to take extra math classes, since you will occasionally recognize concepts and whatnot, but I wouldn't expect anything significant in relation to your physics education (most advanced mathematics is covered in upper division physics courses as it is necessary, so you will likely re-learn things you may have already seen).

Relativity and QM are quite important, and will help a lot if you have an advanced undergraduate course before moving on to the graduate versions. So I'd recommend taking these.
 
Well of course I know that QM is important - but frankly looking at the course outlines, even the more advanced undergraduate courses don't go beyond what's in Griffiths' book, and I've pretty much worked through that already in preparation for summer research I'm doing.

I suppose my point is more: when admissions people look at my transcript, will that list of courses look adequate or will it disadvantage me due to any perceived gaps.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top