Courses Courses of Choice: Master in Nanotech at Keio University

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grieverheart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Courses
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision-making process for selecting elective courses in preparation for a master's program in nanotechnology at Keio University, Japan. The participant is weighing the benefits of taking challenging courses in quantum field theory, quantum information, and nanotechnology against easier options that might yield higher grades. It is suggested that taking relevant courses could enhance their application, especially if applying directly to a nanotechnology program, although the impact may vary if the master's is broader in physics or materials science. The importance of pursuing courses of interest while maintaining good performance is emphasized, alongside the potential advantage of gaining research experience. The participant ultimately decides to follow their interests, recognizing that enjoyment in learning can lead to better outcomes.
Grieverheart
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
My goal right now,is to do a master in nanotechnology and specifically in keio university(japan) when I'm finished from undergrad.I'm studying in greece and in my university we have 40 subjects in total from which 12 are of choise.This means I have to chose 12 subjects out of about 70.Some of these are qft,quantum information(qubits etc.),modern physics lab and there is even a nanotechnology/nanomaterials course.Do you think having those lessons under my belt gives me any sort of advantage when I apply for the master,or should I just chose the easy (and not so interesting) courses in which I could also possibly get a better grade and with less effort?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any thought?
 
Why not just take the courses you are interested in AND do good in them? Also, you may want to give people more than 6 minutes to respond to a post.
 
yeah, as a general guidline, people here don't like you to respond to you own post asking why no one has responded or why there is no thought on your subject. give it some time.

If you are applying directly into a masters program in nanotech/materials, then yes some of the courses will look good. They certainly won't hurt. However if your masters program is just a masters in Physics or material science with emphasis on nanoscience, then they might not hold much weight. but more so as I said above, there can't really be any harm to taking the classes. HOWEVER, I have told many people this before, You could consider taking those 12 elective credits and picking up a minor. It would look nice on your masters application if you had a major in physics/nanoscience (i don't know exactly what your major is) and had a minor in chemistry, computer science, mathematics, English, History, or a foreign language. Those would all make you stand out distinctly from every other physics/nano major applying for the same schools.
 
Thanks for the replies.

Just a clarification about the reply on my own thread,if you take a closer look at the date of my original post,it's one week ago.

bravernix said:
Why not just take the courses you are interested in AND do good in them? Also, you may want to give people more than 6 minutes to respond to a post.

The problem with this is,that I'm taking more than 8 course per semester and I would like to avoid adding more strain to my program if it's not worth it.

Mgiddy,unfortunately we don't have majors and/or minors here in Greece(although 4th year could maybe be accounted as one?).Anyways,if I understand correct,you're saying that having those courses would possibly give me some advantage.

So,I guess I'll pursue them and try my best.In the end,it's easier to do something you like,right?
 
Grieverheart said:
Thanks for the replies.

Just a clarification about the reply on my own thread,if you take a closer look at the date of my original post,it's one week ago.

Yes, you are right of course, sorry about that!

So,I guess I'll pursue them and try my best.In the end,it's easier to do something you like,right?

Certainly this is true. I am not sure how your educational system is there but getting some research experience would be a great idea as well.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top