Coursework help - Stokes Law equation + graphs

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of Stokes Law in an A2 physics coursework experiment involving the calculation of liquid viscosity using ball bearings of various diameters. The key equations utilized include μ=(d²g(Pρ-Ps))/18ν and its rearranged form μ=(2/9)((Pρ-Ps)/v)gr². Participants suggest plotting radius squared (r²) against terminal velocity (v) to establish a linear relationship, with the gradient representing viscosity. The final recommendation is to plot v/r² versus Δρ/μ to achieve a straight line that correlates geometric and physical properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stokes Law and its application in fluid dynamics.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of terminal velocity and viscosity.
  • Basic knowledge of graphing techniques and linear relationships.
  • Ability to manipulate and rearrange algebraic equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to plot experimental data to achieve linear relationships in physics.
  • Learn about the significance of gradients in graphical analysis of physical equations.
  • Explore the implications of systematic versus statistical errors in experimental measurements.
  • Investigate the relationship between density differences and viscosity in fluid dynamics.
USEFUL FOR

Students conducting physics experiments, educators teaching fluid dynamics, and anyone interested in the practical applications of Stokes Law in laboratory settings.

astro111
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi there.
For my A2 physics coursework I have been doing an experiment into stokes law, in which I dropped ball bearings of various diameters into a tube filled with a liquid, worked out their terminal velocities and then used Stokes Law to calculate the viscosity of the liquid. My results have been consistent and in line with my expectations. I then did another experiment, the reverse in a way, in which I used my calculated values for the viscosity of the liquids to find the diameter of ball bearing before measuring it to ensure I was gaining accurate results.

However now I am at the stage of writing up my experiment report and I am a little unsure of what graphs to plot. I've been reading and it sounds as though I should plot a graph of radius2 over velocity, however I am unsure as to what this would show. For example, would the gradient show viscosity?

Homework Equations


The equations I've been using are μ=(d2g(Pρ-Ps))/18ν, where (Pρ-Ps) is the density of the ball bearing minus the density of the fluid, d is the diameter of the ball bearing, g is equal to 9.81 and v is the terminal velocity of the ball bearing. I believe this equation can also be written as μ=(2/9)*((Pρ-Ps)/v)*gr2, where r is the radius of the ball bearing.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried to rearrange the second equation in order to get r2/v, as the graph would be I think? leaving me with 9μ/(2(Pρ-Ps)g) = r2/v, which I think would mean that r2 ∝ 1/v?
However I am confused as to what my graph would show (i.e what the gradient would be equal to etc) and whether I have rearranged the equation correctly.

As a side note, I am unable to ask my teacher presently as I am currently off school ill and ideally I would like to have finished my report when I go back in.
Any help would be much appreciated, thank you!
Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Alex, welcome to PF :) Hope you get well soon.

It's good practice to plot experimental results by using the y-axis for what you measure and the x-axis for what you vary. I suppose you measured the time it took the balls to fall from one level to a lower one. And you varied the diameter and the material of the balls.

Another good practice is to try to plot results in such a way that a linear relationship is achieved (at least according to the prediction of the theory). Sometimes that means you need to square, to take a square root or a logarithm.

If you look at your expression, you see you can write ##\displaystyle v = {d^2 \; \Delta\rho g \over 18\mu}## which looks like ##v = C\; d^2##, so you expect a straight line if you plot something that is proportional to v as a function of something like d2.

Here, v = distance / time means that 1/time is a good one to plot vertically. The distance ##\Delta y## is the same in all cases (right?), so you divide that out in a later stage (*).

For the horizontal axis, asw we saw, diameter d doesn't yield a linear relationship in the theory, but d2 does.

With three materials you hope to get get three more or less straight lines, each with slope ##\displaystyle\Delta\rho g \over 18\mu \Delta y##. Draw the best possible straight lines to determine best values for these slopes.

As a next step, you can claim you measured three slopes as a function of ##\Delta \rho##, so you can plot these slopes vertically and ##\Delta \rho## horizontally. That line is expected to have a slope ##\displaystyle g \over 18\mu \Delta y##. Again, draw the best possible straight line to determine its values. Finally, calculate ##\mu##.

(*) because distance is the same for all measurements, the error in the slopes doesn't get smaller if you use more different ball sizes to get a better line. (The error in the distance is 'systematic' and not statistical)
 
You have the right idea. Consider plotting v/r2 vs Δρ/μ (so that the left hand side is all geometric and kinematic, and the right hand side is all physical properties). The data should all lie on a straight line.

Chet
 
Thank you to both of you, you've helped me greatly!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
34K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K