Covering Sphere w/ Disks: Min Required Radius k

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ynaught?
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the minimum number of disks required to cover a sphere, specifically when the radius of the sphere is k times that of the disks. Participants note that while the surface area of a sphere is 4πr² and that of a disk is πr², the assumption that only four disks can cover a sphere is flawed unless the disks can be distorted. A conclusion reached is that when the radius of the sphere equals the radius of the disks, four disks suffice, but for a sphere with a radius k times that of the disks, the requirement increases to 2k² disks. The conversation also touches on related mathematical concepts, such as the Riemann Sphere and potential three-dimensional complex spaces. Overall, the challenge of covering a sphere with disks raises questions about geometric manipulation and area preservation.
Ynaught?
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
What is the minimum number of disks required to perfectly cover a sphere with a radius k number of times the radius of the disks?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1/0.
 
Werg22, he said "sphere", not "ball".
 
Thanks Wergs22 and HallsofIvy,

...but I was looking for a solution more akin to the disk covering problem http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DiskCoveringProblem.html" but for a sphere rather than the complex plane extended over a sphere. Maybe if we consider the number of steradian needed to cover a sphere?

As an aside, the Riemann Sphere brings up another question... Is there a 3 dimensional complex space where the traditional complex plane has an orthogonal counterpart sharing the same Real axis?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Since the Surface area of a sphere is 4*pi*r^2 and the area of a disc is pi*r^2 wouldn't you need just 4? This is assuming of course you could manipulate the shape of the discs without changing their area.
 
Hey Diffy, I came to the same conclusion for the case where the radius of the sphere and the radius of the disks are equal. And when the radius of the sphere is k times the radius of the disks the number is 2k^2. But I can't see how four disks can cover a sphere without being distorted, in which case, the disks are no longer disks...
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top