CR Transient Problem: Calculate VC at 3 Times

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZxcvbnM2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transient
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a circuit analysis problem involving a capacitor, resistors, and two opposing EMFs. The time constants for the three intervals are calculated as 5.44 seconds, 12 seconds, and 5.44 seconds respectively. The voltage across the capacitor at the end of the first interval is determined to be 30.808 V, and after discharging for 12 seconds, it drops to 11.33 V. Confusion arises regarding the behavior of the capacitor when switching to the second EMF, with interpretations varying on whether it charges or discharges. The final voltage calculation at the end of the third interval is debated, with different approaches suggested based on the polarity of the voltage sources.
ZxcvbnM2000
Messages
62
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The circuit shown in Figure 5 contains two emfs of opposite polarity E1 = 40 V,
and E2 = -20 V. The circuit also contains a switch, resistors R1 and R2, and a
capacitor C.The capacitor is initially discharged.

The switch is connected to position ‘a’ for a period of 8 seconds, after which it is
returned to the unconnected position ‘b‘ for a period of 12 seconds before being
connected to position ‘c’ for a further 8 seconds.

What are the time constants for each of the three time intervals?

Calculate the potential difference across the capacitor, VC, at the end of
each time interval.

[URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/651/dsdxsdxs.jpg/][PLAIN]http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/3112/dsdxsdxs.th.jpg[/URL][/PLAIN]



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




From 0-8 seconds the time constant is T=CR = 5.44 s
From 8-20 seconds T is 12 seconds
From 20- 28 seconds T is 5.44 s


Capacitor voltage at point A : Vc=40(1-e^(-8/5.44)) = 30.808 V ( Charging )

Voltage at B : ( Discharging) Vc' = 30.808e^(-12/12) = 11.33 V

Voltage at C : I don't know what to do . At first the capacitor has 11.33 V but because the polarity of this source is reversed then the capacitor will have to discharge ( go to 0 Volts ) . Is that right ? I am really confused here . Because these 8 seconds from 20-28 it will take some time to discharge from 11.33 to 0 and then recharge again with the other polarity .. WHAT DO I DO ?!

Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
0V isn't a special value; It's all in how you write the equations. If you have a starting voltage and a "final" target voltage, either of which may be positive or negative, what's important is the size of the ΔV that the exponential is traversing. Find the magnitude of that ΔV and use it to write the appropriate decay portion:

##\Delta V e^{-t/\tau}##

then 'adjust' the function by adding an appropriate offset so that it begins at the correct starting voltage.

Regarding the voltage source E2, I see by the diagram that it's given a value E2 = -20 V, but that the symbol for the cell is also oriented with its negative terminal upwards. By strict interpretation then, what should be the potential at point c?
 
Hmm , 20 volts ?But why is it a decay ? It is supposed to be charging , no ?
 
ZxcvbnM2000 said:
Hmm , 20 volts ?
That would be my take on it, strictly interpreting the evidence.
But why is it a decay ? It is supposed to be charging , no ?
I was going by your first interpretation of the net polarity of point c and describing how one might go about accounting for a capacitor voltage change that begins at +11.33V and heads to -20V. If it's really +20V at c, then it will be charging from +11.33V towards +20V.
 
Okay so :Vc = E - e^(-t/T)*(E-Vc') so Vc = -20 -e^(-8/5.44)*(-20-11.33) = -12.8 V , Is that correct ?A friend of mine said that Vc = 11.33*e^(-8/12) -20*(1-e^(-8/5.44)) . He said that it's discharging through two resistors ... i am even more confused now !
 
Your result looks okay if the potential at c is in fact -20V.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top