Crankshafts, which class of lever

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Elquery
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Class Lever
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the classification of crankshafts as levers, specifically examining their potential to be categorized as both first and third class levers. A crankshaft operates with a lever arm (crank throw) exerting force from a piston, with the effort arm being x and the resistance arm being 2x. The fulcrum is positioned at the center of the shaft, allowing for dual interpretations of the lever system. Ultimately, the consensus is that while definitions may vary, the practical application remains unchanged, and the classification may not hold significant value outside academic contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the three classes of levers
  • Basic knowledge of crankshaft mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concept of lever arms and fulcrums
  • Awareness of rotational motion principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of crankshafts in automotive engineering
  • Explore the principles of rotational dynamics
  • Study the applications of different lever classes in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the significance of lever classifications in engineering design
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, mechanical designers, and students studying physics or mechanical engineering who are interested in the practical applications of lever classifications in machinery.

Elquery
Messages
66
Reaction score
10
For those that are familiar with the 3 classes of lever (and the fact that all simple machines are fundamentally either a lever or an inclined plane) I have a question regarding rotational levers such as in a crank shaft.

It seems to me that a crankshaft could simultaneously be considered more than one class of lever. Let's say for example that a piston exerts its force on the crank. It does so with a lever arm (or crank throw) of x. Now let's say the crankshaft directly drives a wheel with a radius of 2x. The effort arm would be x, the resistance arm 2x and the fulcrum the very center of the shaft.

Seeing as this is a round system, could you not look at the system as being effort arm ->fulcrum->load (thereby being considered a first class lever) and yet also look at it as fulcrum->effort arm->load (thereby being considered a third class lever)?

I realize this is all just definition and no matter how you think about it in terms of lever classes, the reality does not change. Just curious if the reasoning for it being both simultaneously is sound.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Elquery said:
Just curious if the reasoning for it being both simultaneously is sound.
Even a simple seesaw can be seen as different lever classes, depending on the reference frame. I never saw much use in those categorizations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule and Dale
Elquery said:
I realize this is all just definition and no matter how you think about it in terms of lever classes, the reality does not change
You have written it for me. :smile: Just stop worrying about it and treat each case according to the situation. Nowhere, except in school, will anyone want you to quote the class of lever. It's one of those curriculum things which waste everyone's time and can only cause worry. See AT's comment.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mechpeac

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K