Crash & Sound Waves: Energy Exchange?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the energy exchange during a non-conservative impact, specifically when a steel ball hits the floor. It raises the question of whether sound waves possess energy and if the energy lost during the impact is converted into sound waves, which is why a sound is heard upon impact. Participants confirm that sound waves do carry energy, supporting the idea that some of the energy lost during the impact is indeed transformed into sound. This exchange illustrates the principles of energy conservation and transformation in physical interactions. Understanding this concept enhances the comprehension of energy dynamics in collisions.
ShadowDatsas
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Greetings!
Once again I don't know where to classify this tread... sorry.
My Question is the following:
Let's say we have a ball of mass, m. Let the mass be a steal ball for example.
We throw the ball at the floor. The impact that follows surely is a non-conservative impact.
(I hope I said this one correctly... the "non-conservaty" means that some energy is lost)
I was wondering...
Do sound waves have energy? Or there are themselfs energy?
And if they do/are, then could we say that some part of the energy that is lost during the impact is turned to sound wave?
That's why we hear the "bam" ? :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ShadowDatsas said:
And if they do/are, then could we say that some part of the energy that is lost during the impact is turned to sound wave?
Absolutely.
 
Thank you very much Doc Al!
That means a lot to me!:P
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top