Create a Ball of Electrons: What Would You See?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TheTankEngine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Electrons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical concept of creating a ball of electrons and what one might observe if such a structure were possible. Participants explore the theoretical implications of confining electrons in a small volume, including their interactions with light and the challenges posed by their mutual repulsion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that due to the repulsive nature of electrons, it would be impossible to form a stable ball of electrons, although they entertain the hypothetical scenario.
  • One participant proposes that if electrons were somehow confined, they would not absorb or emit light, making the ball appear clear, as individual electrons do not transition between energy levels in isolation.
  • Another participant argues that trapped electrons would still absorb and emit light due to their accelerations, likening their behavior to that of a gas, though noting the differences due to long-range repulsion.
  • Some contributors mention that individual electrons can interact with photons, implying that a large number of confined electrons would still interact with light.
  • One participant introduces the concept of Cooper pairs in superconductivity, suggesting that under extreme conditions, electrons can bind together, but clarifies that this is not analogous to the original question about a ball of electrons.
  • Another participant compares the hypothetical ball of electrons to fully ionized plasma, suggesting it would behave similarly and be reflective like a low-resistance metal.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of the original scenario, with one participant emphasizing the lack of a mechanism to hold such a configuration together.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on the nature of a ball of electrons, with multiple competing views on how such a structure would behave and whether it could exist at all. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of confining electrons and their interactions with light.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of a clear mechanism for stabilizing a ball of electrons and the dependence on various assumptions about electron behavior in confinement. The discussion also highlights the speculative nature of the scenario presented.

TheTankEngine
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Just something to think about- What if you could make a ball of electrons, maybe a foot thick, and I have no idea how close together. (I don't know how much energy you would need to do this, but I can imagine it's a lot)

The above is just to get a general idea. My question is this: If you looked at it, what would you see? Would you just see straight through it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since electrons repulse each other, they would tend to fly apart. Thus, you would never be able to get them in a ball. But for the sake of being hypothetical... :)

Electrons absorb and emit light when they are falling from higher orbitals into lower ones, and vice versa, around atoms. This is why you can see things to begin with. Electrons absorb certain exact wavelengths. They reflect the ones that they do not absorb.

Now take just an electron. Is it orbiting anything? No. So it cannot climb to a higher orbital or fall to a lower one, and thus it cannot absorb or emit the the energy required to make this transition.

So to answer your hypothetical question...(and maybe someone else can comment as well?)...I suspect the ball of electrons would be as clear as air, as light is neither reflected nor absorbed.
 
I'm not sure what exactly is meant by a "ball" of electrons "a foot thick", but I take this to mean, "a lot of electrons forced together to occupy a small volume". You could hypothetically trap a large number of electrons using electric and magnetic fields and force them into a small volume. But I am quite sure that the electrons, while trapped, would still absorb and emit light.

In the trapped state, the electrons would undergo frequent accelerations due to their mutual repulsion. The electrons would be "jiggling around" somewhat like the particles of a gas. (But obviously not exactly like the particles of a gas, because gas particles do not repel at long range.)

The accelerating electrons would absorb and emit photons as they transitioned between discrete energy levels within the electron "gas". These discrete energy levels would be so closely spaced as to form a near-continuous band, just like the conduction band available to the electrons of a metal.

At least, this is my best guess! I would not put much trust in what I have said above until this question has been addressed by an expert...
 
I'm not an expert, but I am thinking along the same lines as M.E.T.A.

An individual electron free in space can still interact with photons i believe. Having a large amount of them confined to a small area should stil absorb, reflect, or emit light i think.
 
Haha probably too hypothetical :)
 
I don't pretend to have a strong understanding of them, so I won't offer much explanation but I will offer a link.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solids/coop.html

This is the only way that -I- am aware of being able to bind electrons to one another. It is under a pretty extreme condition too. Very loosely speaking it makes them enter a boson-like state. It's pretty interesting stuff, if you aren't familiar with superconductivity/superfluidity I suggest you research that before cooper pairing.

My guess is that if you had a helium-III superfluid condense into two-atom cooper pairs for a superfluid I would GUESS that you would be able to see the superfluid, though it certainly wouldn't be like the ball or anything that you described and it would be, well, a fluid.
 
I'm also not an expert, but I think the ball of electrons would behave very like a ball of fully ionised plasma, which can be created or viewed ( eg the sun).

It would be reflective like a low resistance metal.
 
TheTechNoir said:
I don't pretend to have a strong understanding of them, so I won't offer much explanation but I will offer a link.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solids/coop.html

This is the only way that -I- am aware of being able to bind electrons to one another. It is under a pretty extreme condition too. Very loosely speaking it makes them enter a boson-like state. It's pretty interesting stuff, if you aren't familiar with superconductivity/superfluidity I suggest you research that before cooper pairing.

My guess is that if you had a helium-III superfluid condense into two-atom cooper pairs for a superfluid I would GUESS that you would be able to see the superfluid, though it certainly wouldn't be like the ball or anything that you described and it would be, well, a fluid.

Cooper pair is nothing like a "ball of electrons" the way the OP is seeking. Note also that cooper pairs cannot occur by themselves. They require coupling to a bosonic "glue", such a phonons in conventional superconductors.

The question presented by the OP is a bit odd, mainly because there is a completely disregard of space-charge effects. There is no mention of any kind of mechanism that will hold such a thing together (there isn't). So essentially one is trying to find consequences of something that doesn't occur.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K