MHB Creating a 4D System with a Specific Solution: How Can It Be Done?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sawdee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    4d System
sawdee
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I know how to solve systems, but the question asks to work backwards.

"Create a 4-d system that has a solution (-2,5,-6,1)."

How would i do this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sawdee said:
I know how to solve systems, but the question asks to work backwards.

"Create a 4-d system that has a solution (-2,5,-6,1)."

How would i do this?

Hi sawdee! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)

Without any other conditions, we can go for the simplest system that satisfies your requirement.
We can pick the system:
\begin{cases}
x_1=-2 \\
x_2 = 5 \\
x_3 = -6 \\
x_4 = 1
\end{cases}
No point in making it more complicated unless there are more restrictions.
We're talking about math - the simplest solution possible should be considered the best one.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi sawdee! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)

Without any other conditions, we can go for the simplest system that satisfies your requirement.
We can pick the system:
\begin{cases}
x_1=-2 \\
x_2 = 5 \\
x_3 = -6 \\
x_4 = 1
\end{cases}
No point in making it more complicated unless there are more restrictions.
We're talking about math - the simplest solution possible should be considered the best one.

Thank you! :) Happy to be here.

I picked that solution as well, but in terms of format I'm not sure how to set up the answer. Should I use a matrix with those 4 as my x values, and leave everything else as 0?
 
sawdee said:
Thank you! :) Happy to be here.

I picked that solution as well, but in terms of format I'm not sure how to set up the answer. Should I use a matrix with those 4 as my x values, and leave everything else as 0?

It depends a bit on what your teacher considers to be a "system".
If it's supposed to involve a matrix, we can pick the identity matrix with right hand values that correspond to the solution.
That is:
$$\begin{bmatrix}
1&0&0&0\\
0&1&0&0\\
0&0&1&0\\
0&0&0&1\\
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
x_1\\
x_2\\
x_3 \\
x_4
\end{bmatrix} =
\begin{bmatrix}
-2 \\
5 \\
-6 \\
1
\end{bmatrix}$$
It's really just the same thing as the "system" I suggested though.
The only difference being what we pick as the notation.
 
I like Serena said:
It depends a bit on what your teacher considers to be a "system".
If it's supposed to involve a matrix, we can pick the identity matrix with right hand values that correspond to the solution.
That is:
$$\begin{bmatrix}
1&0&0&0\\
0&1&0&0\\
0&0&1&0\\
0&0&0&1\\
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
x_1\\
x_2\\
x_3 \\
x_4
\end{bmatrix} =
\begin{bmatrix}
-2 \\
5 \\
-6 \\
1
\end{bmatrix}$$
It's really just the same thing as the "system" I suggested though.
The only difference being what we pick as the notation.
I think this is exactly what he wanted, thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top