MHB Creating a 4D System with a Specific Solution: How Can It Be Done?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sawdee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    4d System
AI Thread Summary
To create a 4D system with the solution (-2, 5, -6, 1), the simplest approach is to directly assign each variable to the corresponding value. A basic system can be structured as x1 = -2, x2 = 5, x3 = -6, and x4 = 1. If a matrix format is required, using the identity matrix with these values as the right-hand side is also valid. The choice of format may depend on the instructor's preferences regarding what constitutes a "system." Ultimately, both methods yield the same solution.
sawdee
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I know how to solve systems, but the question asks to work backwards.

"Create a 4-d system that has a solution (-2,5,-6,1)."

How would i do this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sawdee said:
I know how to solve systems, but the question asks to work backwards.

"Create a 4-d system that has a solution (-2,5,-6,1)."

How would i do this?

Hi sawdee! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)

Without any other conditions, we can go for the simplest system that satisfies your requirement.
We can pick the system:
\begin{cases}
x_1=-2 \\
x_2 = 5 \\
x_3 = -6 \\
x_4 = 1
\end{cases}
No point in making it more complicated unless there are more restrictions.
We're talking about math - the simplest solution possible should be considered the best one.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi sawdee! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)

Without any other conditions, we can go for the simplest system that satisfies your requirement.
We can pick the system:
\begin{cases}
x_1=-2 \\
x_2 = 5 \\
x_3 = -6 \\
x_4 = 1
\end{cases}
No point in making it more complicated unless there are more restrictions.
We're talking about math - the simplest solution possible should be considered the best one.

Thank you! :) Happy to be here.

I picked that solution as well, but in terms of format I'm not sure how to set up the answer. Should I use a matrix with those 4 as my x values, and leave everything else as 0?
 
sawdee said:
Thank you! :) Happy to be here.

I picked that solution as well, but in terms of format I'm not sure how to set up the answer. Should I use a matrix with those 4 as my x values, and leave everything else as 0?

It depends a bit on what your teacher considers to be a "system".
If it's supposed to involve a matrix, we can pick the identity matrix with right hand values that correspond to the solution.
That is:
$$\begin{bmatrix}
1&0&0&0\\
0&1&0&0\\
0&0&1&0\\
0&0&0&1\\
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
x_1\\
x_2\\
x_3 \\
x_4
\end{bmatrix} =
\begin{bmatrix}
-2 \\
5 \\
-6 \\
1
\end{bmatrix}$$
It's really just the same thing as the "system" I suggested though.
The only difference being what we pick as the notation.
 
I like Serena said:
It depends a bit on what your teacher considers to be a "system".
If it's supposed to involve a matrix, we can pick the identity matrix with right hand values that correspond to the solution.
That is:
$$\begin{bmatrix}
1&0&0&0\\
0&1&0&0\\
0&0&1&0\\
0&0&0&1\\
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
x_1\\
x_2\\
x_3 \\
x_4
\end{bmatrix} =
\begin{bmatrix}
-2 \\
5 \\
-6 \\
1
\end{bmatrix}$$
It's really just the same thing as the "system" I suggested though.
The only difference being what we pick as the notation.
I think this is exactly what he wanted, thank you!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top