Creating a Drag Shield for a free fall object

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of creating a drag shield for an object in free fall, specifically aimed at limiting the deceleration experienced by the object to no more than .01 Gs. Participants explore various designs and concepts related to drag shields, their effectiveness, and the physics involved in achieving the desired deceleration during a drop from a height of 10 feet 5 inches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the area required for a drag shield to limit deceleration to .001 Gs, suggesting a flat sheet design.
  • Another participant argues that flat surfaces are ineffective for creating drag, as they do not catch enough air.
  • Concerns are raised about the stability of a flat plate design, with a suggestion that it could behave like a dart if tilted.
  • A participant proposes a design resembling a jet engine with an airfoil, questioning its practicality.
  • Discussion includes the implications of achieving .001 Gs deceleration, noting that air resistance alone may exceed this threshold unless additional thrust is applied.
  • The original poster clarifies that the target deceleration is actually .01 Gs, emphasizing the need for the experiment to be reusable after the drop.
  • Another participant highlights that achieving .01 Gs requires the object to not gain speed, suggesting alternatives like attaching a balloon.
  • Further inquiry is made regarding the specific application and reasons for needing such low deceleration, particularly in relation to impact concerns.
  • A technical approach is presented, discussing the balance of forces involved in achieving terminal velocity and the relationship between downward and upward forces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and design of a drag shield, with no consensus reached on the best approach or the practicality of achieving the desired deceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenges associated with achieving very low deceleration rates and the potential limitations of proposed designs, including the need for specific conditions to be met for effective drag.

mackwithamac
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Would anyone know how to determine the area that a drag shield would have to be to allow an object above not to experience no more then .001 Gs?
The drag shield that I was thinking about is just a flat sheet attached to the bottom of the top object by a string. Would this even be possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it possible to be done?
 
Sure I guess. But its not the right way to do it and you won't have any stability and you will likely wind up with a dart (when the flat plate tilts into the wind and becomes a blade)
 
I'm not sure if this makes sense or not but it's like the shape of a jet engine with an airfoil on the outside: http://i.imgur.com/jV82y.png. The top is solid.
 
You might want to look into whether there is any practical application of a .001g deceleration.

For one, at that rate of deceleration, the object will still be going pretty much full speed after virtually any distance of fall.

On the other hand, at virtually anything but the slowest velocity, air resistance alone will create a deceleration of greater than .001g's, which means in order to keep it lower than that, you may need to actually apply thrust forward, otherwise the object will naturally decelerate faster than that.

I suspect that you are looking for a solution to a problem that can't realistically exist.
 
thank you for all the feedback. and I'm sorry to confuse you but its .01Gs I was wrong when I initially gave the info.
let me give you a little more info and maybe there is a simple solution to my problem:
I have an experiment that will be dropping from a 10ft 5in tower and I need to be able to reuse the experiment after the 1st initial drop and have the experiment only experience .01gs. The reason that the drag shield was brought to my attention is because as it was explained to me, the drag shield will help me reduce the amount of gs on the experiment.
 
mackwithamac said:
thank you for all the feedback. and I'm sorry to confuse you but its .01Gs I was wrong when I initially gave the info.
let me give you a little more info and maybe there is a simple solution to my problem:
I have an experiment that will be dropping from a 10ft 5in tower and I need to be able to reuse the experiment after the 1st initial drop and have the experiment only experience .01gs. The reason that the drag shield was brought to my attention is because as it was explained to me, the drag shield will help me reduce the amount of gs on the experiment.
.01g. That's 9.8cm/s^2. That's tiiiiiiiny.

The only way for your device can not exceed .01g and still arrive at the ground at zero velocity is if it never gets up any speed in the first place.

Maybe attach a giant balloon to it.

How heavy is your device?
 
Even then, you'll have a tough time grabbing enough air to slow you down to .01g's from 10 feet up. Could you be more specific with the application and why you require such little deceleration?

Is it a question of impact?
 
  • #10
What you need to do is match the downward force Fdown = mg with the upward drag force F = ½CρAv2, where ρ is the density of air, C is the drag coefficient, and A is the cross sectional area of the plate or parachute.

So

mg = ½CρAv2

Solve for v to get the terminal velocity. Once an object reaches the terminal velocity, the velocity is constant, and the acceleration is zero.

Bob S
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
883
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K