Creating a Planet of Sky and Clouds: Is it Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nostredame
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet Sky
AI Thread Summary
A planet made entirely of sky and clouds is not feasible due to the lightweight nature of gases like nitrogen, oxygen, and carbon dioxide, which lack the necessary gravity to maintain such an atmosphere. While gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn have dense cores, a planet composed solely of air would require a solid or liquid core due to the immense pressure from the gas above. The formation of a planet from interstellar clouds predominantly composed of hydrogen further complicates the idea of a sky-only planet. A more realistic concept involves a terrestrial planet covered by oceans with a thick atmosphere, allowing for biological activity at higher altitudes. This scenario could enable creatures to thrive in the dense atmosphere, enhancing their ability to fly.
Nostredame
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Sorry if this is in the wrong part of the forum but I am a budding SciFi authro with many ideas. And I just wanted to check if one of my ideas is possible, and if not, how this effect could be best recreated.

I'm sure everyone has seen the Star Wars movies. Well if you remeber Star Wars Episode V (the second released), the characters go to a planet that is seemingly made entirely out of sky.

So my vision is a planet much like this. I envision nothing but sky and clouds, but is a planet made of sky and clouds possible? Or is it possible to have such a small core that is so dense that it produces enough gravity to maintain this atmosphere. And would it be possible to have water (in the form of clouds) on this planet?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Planets made out of clouds are the most common type - gas giants Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune make up most of the planet mass in our solar system.
These all have a rocky core due to the formation process - and an outor core of layers of liquid gas or metallic hydrogen produced by the huge pressure of all the gas on top.

You don't need a dense core to produce all the gravity - the huge mass gas will create gravity as well.
A small gas gianat isn't possible because it wouldn't have enough mass to hold onto the gas
 
Last edited:
This is an interesting question. It's not possible to have a planet made entirely of sky because sky is is made of air (mostly gaseous nitrogen, oxygen and carbon dioxide), and so it's very light weight and wouldn't make enough gravity and would drift away into space.

If you had sufficient mass of nitrogen, oxygen and carbon dioxide to make a planet with gravity, the centre of that planet would still have to be either solid or liquid (depending on the temperature and pressure of the core), because the immense weight of gases results in them becoming compressed into liquid then solid as you go lower in altitude. The reason for this, as I'm sure you're aware, is that pressure increases with decreasing altitude.

Now, it would be very very unlikely (if not impossible) that a planet made of entirely air could ever form anyway because planets all form out of interstellar clouds which are made mostly of hydrogen. This is why the gas giants in our solar system are mostly made of hydrogen.

Hope that helps.
 
To follow up on your other question, in my opinion, the most realistic way to have a "sky planet" would be to have a large terrestrial planet with a completely ocean-covered surface (like the one in attack of the clones). The atmosphere could be so thick that it's insufferably dense at sea level so the main biological activity has to occur at higher altitudes. The great density of the atmosphere at depth would also assist the buoyancy of any creatures that live in the sky (ie, making it easier to fly even if you have only small wings).
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Back
Top