Creating Antimatter or Storing Energy in Space: A Possibility?

Edi
Messages
176
Reaction score
1
2 photons with energies of at least 0.511 MeV are crossing the same spot at the same time - there is 1.22 MeV energy in a point, enough to create electron and positron pair. Will it happen?
If yes, isn't it a nice way to create antimatter, or at least anti-electrons?
If it doesn't, then one could potentially store the energy of, for example, 1Kg in space smaller than an atom and there would be no mass. It could even be much much more energy, possibly infinite. Even if its for tiniest of time scale, still - either one could relatively easy create anti-matter, or ,potentianally, store +- infinite amounts of energy in a single point (or something close to a point) without any mass created ... OR?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edi said:
Will it happen?

Yes.

Edi said:
If yes, isn't it a nice way to create antimatter, or at least anti-electrons?

Well, it's not very cost-effective. It's also not very convenient since you make positrons at or near rest right next to electrons, so they can then immediately annihilate.
 
Hmm, so what about HiPER? That fusion reactor. Shouldn't there be electron and positron creation before the multiple laser beams hit the deuterium-tritium (?) ball?
 
Of course not. You wrote yourself 0.511 MeV. No laser puts out photons of anywhere near that energy.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Yes.

Not "Yes". "Probably".

But cross-section should be sizable (order of ~0.1 barn at resonance), since it's a crossing of Compton scattering.

People are actually working on designing photon-photon colliders. It's not too difficult to modify an electron collider to produce bunches of energetic photons, main thing needed is a powerful laser. If ILC is ever built, one of its operating modes will probably be photon-photon.

http://tesla.desy.de/new_pages/TDR_CD/PartVI/chapter1.pdf
 
Last edited:
No, it's observed. You see it with bremsstrahlung photons in e+e- colliders.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top