Creating Artificial Gravity in Space: Using Centripetal Force on a Space Station

AI Thread Summary
Centripetal force can theoretically be used to create artificial gravity on a space station by rotating the station to generate acceleration. The required rotation speed must be calculated to achieve sufficient acceleration for simulated gravity. However, this design poses challenges, such as the fact that acceleration would be directed towards the center, potentially leaving occupants in the center unable to walk on the ground. The discussion also touches on the distinction between centripetal and centrifugal forces, with a suggestion that centrifugal force is the relevant concept for creating artificial gravity. Overall, the feasibility of using rotation to simulate gravity raises important questions about design and functionality in space environments.
jdawg
Messages
366
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Could centripetal force be used to create a sort of artificial gravity aboard the space station?
If so, how would you go about this?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


At first I wanted to say yes, but how fast would the space station have to rotate to generate enough acceleration? And wouldn't the acceleration come from every direction pointing towards the center of the circular motion? And wouldn't this make the person stuck in the very center of the station, and not able to walk on the ground of the station? Sorry if my questions are poorly worded.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you seen movie "Elysium"?
 
No I haven't, I've heard it's pretty cool though! If I watched it would it help me understand?
 
Ohhh so centripetal force wouldn't work? You would use centrifugal force?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top