Cross product of magnetic fields

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physical meaning of the cross product of two magnetic fields generated by different current loops. While the geometric interpretation of the cross product indicates relationships between vectors, its application to magnetic fields is questioned. The cross product can represent the work done by one magnetic field on a magnetic monopole moving along another loop, although work is a scalar quantity. Clarifications arise regarding the nature of the loops involved, whether they are electric-current or magnetic-monopole loops. Ultimately, the conversation highlights complexities in understanding the interactions between magnetic fields and their mathematical representations.
wofsy
Messages
724
Reaction score
0
Is there any physical meaning to the cross product of two magnetic fields e.g. two fields generated in two different current loops?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not think so, I am at a lost as to a situation where we would take the cross of two different magnetic fields. There is of course the usual geometrical interpretation of the cross product, indicating the anti-parallelism of the vectors, a normal to the vectors, etc., but that applies to any pair of vectors independent of their physical interpretations.
 
Two loops will interact, if that's what you mean, so that the results are more than the sum of each.
 
Born2bwire said:
I do not think so, I am at a lost as to a situation where we would take the cross of two different magnetic fields. There is of course the usual geometrical interpretation of the cross product, indicating the anti-parallelism of the vectors, a normal to the vectors, etc., but that applies to any pair of vectors independent of their physical interpretations.

The reason I asked is that the cross product of the fields of two current loops tells you the work that one field would do on a magnetic monopole moving uniformly along the other loop.
 
wofsy said:
The reason I asked is that the cross product of the fields of two current loops tells you the work that one field would do on a magnetic monopole moving uniformly along the other loop.

But work is a scalar quantity, not a vector.
 
Born2bwire said:
But work is a scalar quantity, not a vector.

True. The work is a scalar factor in the cross product. If you divide out by the work you get a fundamental generator of the second cohomology of R^3 minus the two loops. For instance if the work is zero the the cross product is the curl of another vector.
 
What do you mean by "moving uniformly along the other loop." Are these loops supposed to be electric-current loops or magnetic monopole-current loops?
 
Phrak said:
What do you mean by "moving uniformly along the other loop." Are these loops supposed to be electric-current loops or magnetic monopole-current loops?

Sorry - the monopole doesn't need to move uniformly. It just needs to make a complete circuit of the second loop. It's just that I am used to doing the integral using the unit of arc length.
 
Back
Top