Understanding the Correct Representation of the Cross Product of Vectors

AI Thread Summary
The correct representation of the cross product of two vectors a and b is given by the formula ||axb|| = ||a||||b||sin(x), where x is the smallest angle between the vectors. This formula is valid as long as x is restricted to the interval [0, π], ensuring that sin(x) remains non-negative. The alternative form, ||axb|| = ||a||||b||||sin(x)||, is theoretically incorrect because it does not account for the directional properties of the cross product. While both forms yield the same magnitude, the first one accurately reflects the geometric interpretation of the cross product. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for proper application in vector mathematics.
phydis
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
a and b are two vectors and x is the angle between them.

||axb|| = ||a||||b||sinx ------(1)
||axb|| = ||a||||b||||sinx|| ------(2)

which one is correct? why?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1. That is one definition of cross product.
 
x is the smallest angle between vectors a and b. You should convince yourself that this implies both forms are equivalent.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
if x is the smallest angle between a and b, when n is the unit vector perpendicular to both a and b,

axb = ||axb||n

am i correct?
 
phydis said:
a and b are two vectors and x is the angle between them.

||axb|| = ||a||||b||sinx ------(1)
||axb|| = ||a||||b||||sinx|| ------(2)

which one is correct? why?

Your first one is correct :

##||axb|| = ||a|| ||b|| sin(θ)##
 
phydis said:
if x is the smallest angle between a and b, when n is the unit vector perpendicular to both a and b,

axb = ||axb||n

am i correct?

Yes

Zondrina said:
Your first one is correct :

##||axb|| = ||a|| ||b|| sin(θ)##

I think the OP also wanted to know why. I would say the two forms are equivalent. What is your argument for why the other form is incorrect?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
CAF123 said:
I think the OP also wanted to know why. I would say the two forms are equivalent. What is your argument for why the other form is incorrect?

if two forms are equivalent then ||sinx||= sinx (where x is the smallest angle between a and b)
how can you explain this?
 
phydis said:
if two forms are equivalent then ||sinx||= sinx (where x is the smallest angle between a and b)
how can you explain this?

Given that x is the smallest angle between a and b what is the possible values of x?
 
This has to do with what values of x we allow. We need the absolute value if we are to allow x such that sin x<0
 
  • #10
CAF123 said:
Given that x is the smallest angle between a and b what is the possible values of x?

assume x= 11∏/6 , then smallest angle between a and b ∏/6, but when applying it to x it should be -∏/6. shouldn't it? (if it shouldn't then why?)

are ||sin(-∏/6)|| and sin(-∏/6) equivalent?
 
  • #11
phydis said:
assume x= 11∏/6 , then smallest angle between a and b ∏/6, but when applying it to x it should be -∏/6. shouldn't it?
No, x is restricted to lie within the interval ##[0, \pi]##. Check your book. This condition will come with the definition of cross product.
 
  • #12
Who cares if x is in [0,pi) or not. We have |sin x| if sin x is already positive sin x will do.
 
  • #13
lurflurf said:
Who cares if x is in [0,pi) or not. We have |sin x| if sin x is already positive sin x will do.

Yes, so if ##x \in [0,\pi]## then ##|a \times b| = |a| |b| \sin x## since sin x is positive. If x is not in this interval, then ##|a \times b| = |a| |b| |\sin x|## (the magnitude of ##a\times b## is not negative so we take the modulus of sin x)

In any book I have read, they put the condition that x is in [0,π], so you see it written ##|a \times b| = |a| |b| \sin x## more commonly.
 
  • #14
According to the way of my thinking ||axb|| = ||a||||b||sinx is enough to represent magnitude of axb for all x angle.

let n be an unit vector perpendicular to both a and b vectors. therefore we get,

||axb|| = || ||a||||b||sinx n ||

when x > 0, ||axb|| = ||a||||b||sinx ||n||
since ||n|| = 1 , ||axb|| = ||a||||b||sinx

when x<0, ||axb|| = || ||a||||b||sin(-x) n || = ||a||||b||sinx ||-n|| (with right hand rule)
since ||-n|| = 1 , ||axb|| = ||a||||b||sinx

although the other form (2) gives the same magnitude, it is theoretically incorrect.
and only this imaginary of mine is not confusing me. I want to know does this really happen there?
 
Back
Top