Cross term gives the autocorrelation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the term "cross term" in the context of the autocorrelation function. The autocorrelation function is expressed as an integral involving a product of functions, and the cross term arises when expanding the squared sum of these functions. Specifically, the cross term refers to the mixed product of the two functions, which is essential for calculating the autocorrelation. By expanding the integrand, one can derive three integrals, with the middle integral representing the autocorrelation. This clarification aids in grasping the mathematical formulation of autocorrelation in the research paper.
SamTaylor
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am reading a research paper about "narrow" autocorrelation and
at the beginning there is an expression I don't unterstand

The autocorrelation function is defined as the product
g(\tau) = \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(t) \cdot f(t-\tau) dt
It is convenient to calculate this as <|f(t) + f(t-\tau)|^2>,
where the cross term gives the autocorrelation.

http://www.wellesley.edu/Physics/brown/pubs/acv85_P1595-P1601.pdf"

Does someone know what is meant with the word cross term?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When you expand (a+b)2, it becomes a2 +2ab +b2.

The term 2ab is the cross term. What you want is gotten by expanding the integrand to get 3 integrals and using the middle one, omitting the 2.
 
Thanks
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top