Cross term gives the autocorrelation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the concept of "cross terms" in the context of autocorrelation functions, specifically in the expression g(τ) = ∫_{-∞}^∞ f(t) · f(t-τ) dt. The user seeks clarification on the term "cross term," which is illustrated through the expansion of (a+b)² resulting in a² + 2ab + b², where 2ab is identified as the cross term. The explanation emphasizes the importance of expanding the integrand to derive the autocorrelation correctly by isolating the relevant integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of autocorrelation functions in signal processing
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Knowledge of mathematical expansions, specifically binomial expansion
  • Basic concepts of statistical analysis in research papers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of autocorrelation functions in signal processing
  • Learn about integral calculus applications in statistical analysis
  • Explore binomial expansion and its relevance in mathematical proofs
  • Read the referenced research paper on autocorrelation for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, statisticians, and students in physics or engineering who are analyzing autocorrelation in data sets and require a clear understanding of mathematical terms and their implications in statistical functions.

SamTaylor
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am reading a research paper about "narrow" autocorrelation and
at the beginning there is an expression I don't unterstand

The autocorrelation function is defined as the product
[tex]g(\tau) = \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(t) \cdot f(t-\tau) dt[/tex]
It is convenient to calculate this as [tex]<|f(t) + f(t-\tau)|^2>[/tex],
where the cross term gives the autocorrelation.

http://www.wellesley.edu/Physics/brown/pubs/acv85_P1595-P1601.pdf"

Does someone know what is meant with the word cross term?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
When you expand (a+b)2, it becomes a2 +2ab +b2.

The term 2ab is the cross term. What you want is gotten by expanding the integrand to get 3 integrals and using the middle one, omitting the 2.
 
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K