I Crum's shell effect - visualisation needed

AI Thread Summary
When a bubble in liquid expands, the surrounding liquid shell becomes thinner and more concentrated, leading to an increased rate of gas diffusion into the bubble. Conversely, during contraction, the shell thickens and its concentration decreases, resulting in reduced diffusion into the bubble. The discussion highlights the importance of the concentration gradient in controlling gas flow, as a thinner shell enhances diffusion while a thicker shell hinders it. Clarification on the terminology used in the original paper is necessary, particularly regarding whether "to the bubble" refers to gas entering the bubble or molecules accumulating at the bubble wall. Ultimately, the diffusion process is influenced by the concentration gradient between the liquid shell and the bubble.
rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
When a bubble in liquid expands or contracts it can be seen as having a liquid shell that gets larger on expansion and smaller on compression.

The idea of diffusion is what I am struggling with, if the bubble was getting bigger and the liquid shell contracts then surely it would become more concentrated and diffusion into the bubble from the liquid would be reduced? likewise if the bubble was getting smaller the liquid shell would get bigger and it would be less concentrated, therefore diffusion from the liquid into the bubble would increase?

BUT Crum did not say this, he said the opposite, i'll quote a paper:

The gas diffusion is controlled by the thickness of a diffusion layer or a shell that is formed in the liquid surrounding the bubble (the bubble is assumed to be surrounded by a constant mass of liquid). When the bubble is expanded, the shell becomes thinner and the concentration gradient increases. In this case, the flow rate of gas to the bubble also increases. When the bubble is compressed, the shell is thicker as a result the concentration gradient decreases.

The problem is the language is vague, it says "to the bubble", do they mean into the bubble, do they mean molecules move to the bubble wall and stay there?

Any help with this idea would really be appreciated. Why would diffusion into the bubble occur more readily if the concentration of the wall was increased? which would intuitively make it harder for gas molecules to penetrate.

Paper source: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0307904X0300204X
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll update for anyone else who comes across this, now solved. The key was that it occurs from the shell and is the same substance as the bulk solution, therefore it's simply a concentration gradient issue. Here's what I have written:

On expansion, a liquid shell surrounding the bubble may be envisaged that becomes thinner and more concentrated and thus the rate of diffusion from the shell into the bubble increases. On contraction the shell would become larger it’s concentration would decrease therefore the aforementioned diffusion would not readily occur [24].
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top