Crystal Lattice of Spin-1 Particles: Chemical Potential?

akoe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A crystal lattice consists of a spin 1 particle at each lattice point. Spin 1 particles can have z-components of magnetic moment that take on the values +μZ, 0, and -μZ. In an external magnetic field B, each spin can have an energy U = -μZB, so the possible energies are +μZB, 0, and -μZB. We place the crystal lattice so that it is in thermal equilibrium with a reservoir at temperature T as well as in an external magnetic field B. Your answers should be in terms of any of μZ, B, T, N, and fundamental constants.
a. Write down the single particle partition function for one of these spin 1 particles located at a lattice point.
b. Determine the probability of finding the particle in the "up" state.
c. The system consists of N such spin 1 particles. Write down the total partition function for these N spin 1 particles. Let's assume that the particles only interact with the external magnetic field and the thermal reservoir.


Homework Equations


Z = ∑e-[E(s)-μN(s)]/kT


The Attempt at a Solution


I think that I could do the rest of the problem if I could figure out how to calculate the chemical potential for this particular set up, and then calculate the partition function from there. I thought about trying to calculate it by N = ∑\frac{1}{e^{(ε-μ)/kT}-1}, but I don't think that can be right for part A, because we aren't even looking at the N particles yet.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello akoe - these are localized particles, so you can just use Boltzmann statistics.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top