Crystallographic planes and square pyramids

  • Thread starter Thread starter comicnabster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planes Square
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the aspect ratio of a square pyramid-shaped AFM silicon tip, where each face corresponds to a (111) silicon plane, and the tip is etched from a [100] silicon wafer. The participant struggles with understanding crystallographic directions and how to relate the [100] vector to the (111) planes using the Pythagorean theorem. They consider the height of the pyramid in relation to the base dimensions, attempting to connect the geometry with the Miller indices. Additionally, they mention a derived relationship between silicon's atomic radius and lattice constant but find it irrelevant to the main question. Ultimately, the participant indicates they have solved the problem.
comicnabster
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In materials science right now we are learning about miller indices and crystallographic directions, including planes.

What is the aspect ratio (height/width) of an AFM (atomic force microscope) silicon tip in the shape of a square pyramid where each face of the pyramid is a (111) silicon plane? The silicon tip is etched out of a [100] silicon wafer. The questions says that for a [100] wafer the [100] direction points normal to the surface.

Homework Equations



The book doesn't give any actual equations, only the miller indices definitions, which match what is given on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_index Basically each digit within the brackets represents one of three directions the plane takes, but not the actual value.

Silicon has a diamond crystal structure that is actually two FCC crystal structures offset along the vector (a/4, a/4, a/4) where a represents the lattice constant.

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't have a good grasp of the crystallographic direction material, unfortunately.

I think the tip of the pyramid relative to the center of the base can be expressed by the miller indices [100] in terms of vector notation. After that it would be a matter of relating the [100] vector to the (111) planes with the Pythagorean theorem.

Would I interpret the (111) plane as having a height of 1 in the z direction and the base having length 1 for both the x and y direction? Then the height would be 1/(sqrt2) (read it as 1 over root 2). But then it doesn't seem to connect with the [100] normal vector, which confuses me.

P.S. I have also derived that in silicon's crystal structure the atomic radius and lattice constant can be related by the equation r = (a(3)^0.5)/8 (read it as "a root 3 over 8"), but I don't get how this is relevant to the question, however the information was provided so I think it relates somehow.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, solved.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top