CT for restricted earth fault (REF) protection

AI Thread Summary
For Restricted Earth Fault (REF) protection, the nominal primary current transformer (CT) ratios typically need to be the same in high impedance systems, while low impedance systems allow for different ratios. The current transformers in use include a 2000/5 CT on the 20kV switchgear and a 1200/5 CT on the neutral of the power transformer. The Areva Micom P632 relay is recommended for this application. Additionally, resources such as Protection Riddle No.59 can provide further insights into low and high differential protection. A request for a three-line diagram of a 500kV substation was also made by a participant seeking guidance on the topic.
saragiha
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Does somebody could advice me, whether the nominal primary CT to be used for REF protection must be same?

The CT I have now as follow:
Power Transformer: 60MVA, 150/20kV, Ynyn(0)d1
CT on 20kV switchgear 2000/5, class 5P20
CT on neutral Power Transformer: 1200/5, class X
Relay to be used: Areva Micom P632
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Generally in high impedance Restricted Earth Fault (REF) protection, the ratio of involved CTs must be same, but in low impedance type it can be difference.
For more information about low and high differential protection also REF you can refer to Protection Riddle No.59 and other riddles from http://electrical-riddles.com
 
Dear msj,

thank you, helpfully
 
three line diagram of 500kV Substation

Hi...

Does somobody have a sample three line diagram of 500kV Substation?
I will have a disscussion of this topic, unfortunately I'm new on this topic.

Regards,
Saragiha
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top