Cubic and monolayer difference

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mohammad-gl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Difference
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the differences between cubic boron phosphide and monolayer boron phosphide, exploring their structures, properties, and potential applications in various fields such as semiconductors, cutting tools, and catalysts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the specific applications of cubic and monolayer boron phosphide, suggesting uses in hard cutting tools, semiconductors, or catalysts.
  • One participant notes that cubic boron phosphide (F-43m) and rhombohedral boron phosphide (R-3m) are refractory materials with high melting temperatures and low compressibility, highlighting their potential as wide bandgap semiconductors.
  • Another participant questions whether the Gruneisen parameter of cubic boron phosphide is equal to that of monolayer boron phosphide, indicating a specific interest in their thermodynamic properties.
  • It is mentioned that monolayer boron phosphide adopts a hexagonal structure, similar to single-layer boron nitride or graphene, which contrasts with the cubic structure of the bulk material.
  • A participant clarifies that "monolayer" does not necessarily imply an ordered structure, as it can refer to a surface covered by one layer of atoms or molecules, with the arrangement depending on various factors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the structural characteristics of monolayer boron phosphide compared to cubic boron phosphide, and there is no consensus on the equivalence of their Gruneisen parameters. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differences for their applications.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of consensus on the structural ordering of monolayer boron phosphide and its thermodynamic properties compared to cubic boron phosphide. The discussion also highlights dependencies on surface conditions and other factors affecting material properties.

Mohammad-gl
Messages
29
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
Difference between cubic and monolayer
What is the difference for example between cubic boron phosphide and monolayer boron phosphide?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are you using them for; hard cutting tool surface, as a semiconductor, or as a catalyst?

There are two forms;
Cubic (F-43m) BP and rhombohedral (R-3m) B12P2 boron phosphides are refractory (melting temperatures at ambient pressure are 2840 K [1] and 2390 K [2]) and low-compressible (300-K bulk moduli are 174 GPa [3] and 192 GPa [4]) wide bandgap semiconductors that have attracted considerable attention due to their superior physical properties.
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02131914/document
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mohammad-gl
Baluncore said:
What are you using them for; hard cutting tool surface, as a semiconductor, or as a catalyst?

There are two forms;

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02131914/document
Thank you.
I want to know, for example, is the Gruneisen parameter of the cubic BP equal to monolayer BP?
 
Mohammad-gl said:
Thank you.
I want to know, for example, is the Gruneisen parameter of the cubic BP equal to monolayer BP?
I'm using it as a semiconductor.
 
No, monolayer boron phosphide adopts a hexagonal structure analogous to single layer boron nitride or graphene.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mohammad-gl
Note also that "monolayer" does not imply an ordered structure; it typically just means that you have a surface covered with one layer of atoms or molecules. If you have a 2D material then this structure might indeed be ordered, but in general this is not the case because where the atoms/molecules end up strongly depends on the surface they are sitting on (plus lots of other factors such as temperature etc).
You frequently also see people use expressions such as "0.5 ML" which simply means that on average half the surface is covered.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K