Current Loop equivalent to Earth's Magnetic Field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the current needed in a superconducting loop around the Earth's magnetic equator to replicate the Earth's magnetic field, which is approximately 31 microTesla at the equator and 58 microTesla at 50 degrees latitude. An initial estimate suggests around 20 megaamperes (MA) would be required in a vacuum, but this figure may be reduced due to the Earth's iron content. The participant references the US/UK World Magnetic Model for 2010-2015 as a resource for necessary data. They express uncertainty in their calculations, particularly regarding the application of the formula B=uI/2R, which is designed for a current ring's center rather than a spherical surface. The conversation highlights the complexities of calculating magnetic fields from currents in different contexts.
.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
3,759
Reaction score
1,837
I'm trying to get a feel for the overall magnitude of the Earth's magnetic field.

If I placed a superconducting belt around the Earth magnetic equator, how much current would that loop have to carry to approximate the Earth magnetic field?

Currently, the field at the equator is about 31 microT and at 50 degrees latitude is about 58 microT.

If I replace the Earth with a vacuum, it looks like I would need on the order of 20MA - but I have no confidence in that estimate. It looks to me as though the Earth's iron content might bring this number down.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bobbywhy said:
This document appears to have all the necessary data to answer your questions:

The US/UK World Magnetic Model for 2010-2015
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/WMM/data/WMM2010/WMM2010_Report.pdf

That all very incredibly detailed - but I would settle for and answer that's off by a factor of 2.
I have the basic data and the B=uI/2R formula (for the center of a current ring). What I don't have is any experience calculating magnetic fields directly from currents - so I am very uncertain of my computations.

Also, the B=uI/2R is for the center of a current ring, not on the surface of a sphere girdled by a current ring - so I don't have a direct comparison. The B=uI/2R also assumes a constant permeability (u) which is not the case of a solid sphere hanging in a vacuum.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top