Curry Triangle Paradox: Rearranging Pieces to Figure of Less Area?

  • Thread starter Thread starter meteor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Because there are liberties being taken with the pieces - you are presming that everything fits exactly, yet the green triangle and the red triangle are not similar triangles as they ought to be. The ratios of the non-hyptoneuse sides 'appear' to be 2/5 and 3/8 so although it looks right, it isn't. if we were to take absolute care in constructing it we would see it is an impossible construction.

if you want to really mix your head up there is a genuine paradox called Banach-Tarskl, that is mathematically 'sound'
 
Right. Solving the triangles shows that the green triangle and the Red triangle have different angles and are not similar. Also, put a straight edge on the hypotenuse of each large triangle; one is concave, the other convex. This is also the same method that the government has used for over 200 years to calculate the budget.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top