TrickyDicky
- 3,507
- 28
What is the minimum number of parameters needed to uniquely specify a point in a curved line?
Ben Niehoff said:One?
What are you trying to get at?
micromass said:A circle can be described as (cos(t),sin(t)). So it requires only one parameter, namely t...
micromass said:Well, to describe a point in \mathbb{R}^2, you'll need two values. So to describe a curve you'll need 2 coordinates. If that's what you're getting at.
TrickyDicky said:Basically what I was thinking is that for every curved manifold of a given dimension (one in the case of the circle), one needs n+1 coordinates to describe it in terms of the Euclidean embedding space, right?
You are right of course, I wasn't very precise, thanks for the reference.micromass said:This is certainly not true in general. It happens to be true for 1-dimensional manifolds though.
Take the Klein bottle for example, this has dimension 2, but one needs 4 coordinates to describe it, i.e. it can only be embedded in \mathbb{R}^4.
In general, take a look at the Whitney embedding theorem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitney_embedding_theorem
which states that every smooth n-dimensional manifold can be embedded in \mathbb{R}^{2n}. One cannot do better in general, although in some specific cases we can.
TrickyDicky said:What is the minimum number of parameters needed to uniquely specify a point in a curved line?
Sure, I was mixing there parameters, coordinates and dimensions.chiro said:If a proper parametrization exists, then one if your object is a line, no matter how many dimensions that curve is embedded in.