Curved motion, r(φ) when r is accelerating

  • Thread starter Thread starter kamil.borkowski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerating Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the equation r(t) for the motion of a clay target in a spring-powered thrower, particularly under conditions of acceleration. The initial velocity of the target is 27 m/s, but other parameters, including forces like friction, complicate the calculations. Participants emphasize the need for a complete set of requirements to derive a suitable r(t) formula, highlighting the importance of understanding the forces involved. The instantaneous velocity in polar coordinates is noted, with a focus on ensuring the velocity vector's magnitude matches the target's speed at the end of the arm. Overall, a physically reasonable formula for r(t) is crucial for accurately describing the target's motion.
kamil.borkowski
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi there!

I have a problem to find an equation of r(t), which will help me to describe motion of blue dot. I have seen many cases where there is a linear motion and you can write φ=ωt , r=V0t, but here there is an acceleration. I think I can write φ=εt2/2, but what about r(t) ? I have tried differencial equation
r = at2/2 + r0 → r = (r''-rφ')t2/2 + r0, but not sure if it's right. I need all this to have equation of path r(φ). r0 is initial position of blue dot, where V0=0 and ω=0. Cheers!

9iqvmd.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
kamil.borkowski said:
Hi there!

I have a problem to find an equation of r(t), which will help me to describe motion of blue dot.

There are many possible formulas for r(t) that would produce a curved trajectory. To pose a specific mathematical problem, you have to state a complete set of requirements for r(t). Is this a physics problem? Are forces involved?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
There are many possible formulas for r(t) that would produce a curved trajectory. To pose a specific mathematical problem, you have to state a complete set of requirements for r(t). Is this a physics problem? Are forces involved?

I am trying to describe a motion of a clay target in a spring-powered target thrower. You can involve some forces (f.ex. friction between target and friction tunnel of an arm), but this complicates case even more. The only constant I can assume is velocity when target leaves the arm (27m/s). Everything else has to be calculated. The main thing is to have ε of this arm, because then from M=I⋅ε we can have required force in a spring.
 
The instantaneous velocity in polar coordinates is given by the vector \frac{dr}{dt}r in the radial direction and \frac{d\theta}{dt} \theta in the tangential direction. If you want the magnitude of this velocity vector to be 27 m/sec at the time t when the target reaches the end of the arm, you have to keep in mind the contribution of the component \frac{dr}{dt} r to the velocity. It will be important to have a physically reasonable formula for r(t).
 
kamil.borkowski said:
You can involve some forces (f.ex. friction between target and friction tunnel of an arm), but this complicates case even more.
Without forces, how would you know how the object moves?
kamil.borkowski said:
Everything else has to be calculated.
There are many possible motions that end with a speed of 27m/s.
 
kamil.borkowski said:
The only constant I can assume is velocity when target leaves the arm (27m/s). Everything else has to be calculated,
I think you at least need to also know the time it needs to get to that speed (from rest?), to get the (constant?) angular acceleration of the thrower. Then I would use the rotating reference frame of the thrower to compute r(t) using the inertial forces there.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top