Curvilinear motion of force-couple system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on predicting the motion of a force-couple system, particularly how the changing direction of force affects motion. Participants are exploring the relationship between tangential and normal acceleration, questioning which component—force or moment—contributes to each type of acceleration. There is a request for a diagram to clarify the system's dynamics, as the current representation may not accurately depict the forces involved. Concerns are raised about the upward acceleration of the box, as it appears unsupported by any force in the provided top view diagram. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of analyzing both rotational and translational accelerations in such systems.
Fishon91
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a system of forces which I have reduced to a force-couple system. I am trying to predict the motion of the force and couple. This is hard because the force changes direction as the moment turns the particle. I imagine this should be turned into some sort of tangential-normal components. But which force causes tangential acceleration, and which force causes normal aceleration. The force or the moment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you send a diagram?
 
In the attached photo A, L, D and Phi are constants. There is a torque and a force applied to this box, or whatever it is. In front of the box is what I imagine the motion caused by the force and the torque will make the box go in.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    10 KB · Views: 410
I think the question is probably one where the box has both rotational acceleration and translational acceleration. I am not sure you have analysed the problem correctly. A torque should be two balanced forces with a spacing between their lines of action. You seem to be giving the box an upward acceleration but I cannot see a force doing that.
 
The picture is a top view, not a side view. The picture is displayed in the X-Y plane.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top