Curvilinear motion of force-couple system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on predicting the motion of a force-couple system, particularly how the changing direction of force affects motion. Participants are exploring the relationship between tangential and normal acceleration, questioning which component—force or moment—contributes to each type of acceleration. There is a request for a diagram to clarify the system's dynamics, as the current representation may not accurately depict the forces involved. Concerns are raised about the upward acceleration of the box, as it appears unsupported by any force in the provided top view diagram. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of analyzing both rotational and translational accelerations in such systems.
Fishon91
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a system of forces which I have reduced to a force-couple system. I am trying to predict the motion of the force and couple. This is hard because the force changes direction as the moment turns the particle. I imagine this should be turned into some sort of tangential-normal components. But which force causes tangential acceleration, and which force causes normal aceleration. The force or the moment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you send a diagram?
 
In the attached photo A, L, D and Phi are constants. There is a torque and a force applied to this box, or whatever it is. In front of the box is what I imagine the motion caused by the force and the torque will make the box go in.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    10 KB · Views: 411
I think the question is probably one where the box has both rotational acceleration and translational acceleration. I am not sure you have analysed the problem correctly. A torque should be two balanced forces with a spacing between their lines of action. You seem to be giving the box an upward acceleration but I cannot see a force doing that.
 
The picture is a top view, not a side view. The picture is displayed in the X-Y plane.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top