Cylinder Optimization for a Minimum?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on optimizing the cost of producing a cylindrical can with a volume of 600 cm³, where the end pieces are three times more expensive per cm² than the wall. The cost function is derived as C = 2πr(V/r²) + 6πr², leading to the differentiation dC/dr = -2V/r² + 12πr. Setting the derivative to zero results in the optimal radius of 7.3 cm and a height of 3.6 cm, yielding a volume of approximately 602.7 cm³. This solution effectively balances the cost of materials used for the wall and end pieces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically differentiation
  • Familiarity with geometric formulas for volume and surface area
  • Knowledge of cost functions in optimization problems
  • Basic understanding of cylindrical geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study optimization techniques in calculus, particularly Lagrange multipliers
  • Learn about cost minimization strategies in manufacturing
  • Explore advanced geometric optimization problems
  • Investigate the impact of material costs on design decisions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and manufacturing professionals involved in cost optimization and design of cylindrical structures.

dandaman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Question: Cost of producing cylindrical can determined by materials used for wall and end pieces. If end pieces are 3 times as expensive per cm2 as the wall, find dimensions (to nearest millimeter) to make a can at minimal cost with volume of 600 cm3.
Relevant equations: a) V=600cm3=[pi]r2h

b) surface area = 2[pi]r2 + [pi]rh

The miraculous attempt:

a) solve h in terms of [pi]r2: 600=[pi]r2h ; 600/[pi]r2=h

b) find surface area equation using h: SA=2[pi]r2 + 2[pi]r(600/[pi]r2 ; SA=2[pi]r2 + 2(600/r) ; SA=2[pi]r2 + 1200/r

c) first derivative: SA'= 4[pi]r - (600/r2) = 0


I am regrettably hitting a brick wall on what should happen next. Additional information is that I think the cost looks something like: 2[pi]r2 = (2[pi]rh)(3), with the multiplication by 3 being the fact that the round end pieces are three times as expensive.

Any and all further help would be greatly appreciated.

Dan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The constraint equation is as you have it
V = pi*r^2*h = 600

The cost function is the surface area, weighted by the production cost factors:
C = 2*pi*r*h + 3*2*pi*r^2
where the first term is the cost of producing the side wall and the second term is the cost of producing the two ends, with the factor 3 included to reflect the higher manufacturing cost for the ends.

Your previous approach was to solve the constraint for h, so let us do this again:
h = V/(pi*r^2)
and then substitute into the cost function
C = 2*pi*r*V/(pi*r^2) + 3*2*pi*r^2
= 2*V/r + 6*pi*r^2

Now differentiate wrt r ...
dC/dr = -2*V/r^2+12*pi*r
set the derivative equal to zero...
0 = -2*V/r^2 + 12*pi*r
=V - 6*pi*r^3
r^3 = V/(6*pi)
and so forth...
(all assuming that I did not make any mistakes!)
 
Thanks a million! The math seems to check out on paper as well, with a radius of 7.3 cm and a height of 3.6 cm. (Volume would end up being 602.7 cm3.)

Dan
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K